random-fu-0.0.2.1: src/Data/Random/Distribution/Binomial.hs
{-
- ``Data/Random/Distribution/Binomial''
-}
{-# LANGUAGE
MultiParamTypeClasses,
FlexibleInstances, FlexibleContexts,
UndecidableInstances, TemplateHaskell
#-}
module Data.Random.Distribution.Binomial where
import Data.Random.Internal.TH
import Data.Random.RVar
import Data.Random.Distribution
import Data.Random.Distribution.Beta
import Data.Random.Distribution.Uniform
import Data.Int
import Data.Word
import Control.Monad
-- algorithm from Knuth's TAOCP, 3rd ed., p 136
-- specific choice of cutoff size taken from gsl source
-- note that although it's fast enough for large (eg, 2^10000)
-- @Integer@s, it's not accurate enough when using @Double@ as
-- the @b@ parameter.
integralBinomial :: (Integral a, Floating b, Ord b, Distribution Beta b, Distribution StdUniform b) => a -> b -> RVar a
integralBinomial t p = bin 0 t p
where
-- GHC likes to discharge Beta to the Beta instance's context, which
-- @integralBinomial@'s context doesn't (directly) satisfy.
-- Seems like GHC could do better. GHC could discharge it in @integralBinomial@'s
-- context when attempting to satisfy bin, since the Beta instance covers all @b@,
-- whereupon it would find that the contexts do, in fact, match.
-- Of course, it's a pretty obscure case, so maybe it's better to just
-- leave it to the coder who's doing weird stuff to tell the compiler what
-- he/she wants.
-- Anyway, this type signature makes GHC happy.
bin :: (Integral a, Floating b, Ord b, Distribution Beta b, Distribution StdUniform b) => a -> a -> b -> RVar a
bin k t p
| t > 10 = do
let a = 1 + t `div` 2
b = 1 + t - a
x <- beta (fromIntegral a) (fromIntegral b)
if x >= p
then bin k (a - 1) (p / x)
else bin (k + a) (b - 1) ((p - x) / (1 - x))
| otherwise = count k t
where
count k 0 = return k
count k (n+1) = do
x <- stdUniform
(count $! (if x < p then k + 1 else k)) n
-- this gives 'believable' results... but is it really any good?
selectA cutoff t = return a
-- | cutoff >= a = return a
-- | otherwise = generalBernoulli a (a `div` cutoff) p
--
where
a = 1 + t `div` 2
-- p = 0.5 :: Float -- fromIntegral cutoff / fromIntegral a :: Float
-- TODO: improve performance
integralBinomialCDF :: (Integral a, Real b) => a -> b -> a -> Double
integralBinomialCDF n p x = sum
[ fromIntegral (n `c` i) * p' ^^ i * (1-p') ^^ (n-i)
| i <- [0 .. x]
]
where
p' = realToFrac p
n `c` k = product [n-k+1..n] `div` product [1..k]
-- would it be valid to repeat the above computation using fractional @t@?
-- obviously something different would have to be done with @count@ as well...
floatingBinomial :: (RealFrac a, Distribution (Binomial b) Integer) => a -> b -> RVar a
floatingBinomial t p = fmap fromInteger (rvar (Binomial (truncate t) p))
floatingBinomialCDF :: (CDF (Binomial b) Integer, RealFrac a) => a -> b -> a -> Double
floatingBinomialCDF t p x = cdf (Binomial (truncate t :: Integer) p) (floor x)
binomial :: Distribution (Binomial b) a => a -> b -> RVar a
binomial t p = rvar (Binomial t p)
data Binomial b a = Binomial a b
$( replicateInstances ''Int integralTypes [d|
instance ( Floating b, Ord b
, Distribution Beta b
, Distribution StdUniform b
) => Distribution (Binomial b) Int
where rvar (Binomial t p) = integralBinomial t p
instance ( Real b , Distribution (Binomial b) Int
) => CDF (Binomial b) Int
where cdf (Binomial t p) = integralBinomialCDF t p
|])
$( replicateInstances ''Float realFloatTypes [d|
instance Distribution (Binomial b) Integer
=> Distribution (Binomial b) Float
where rvar (Binomial t p) = floatingBinomial t p
instance CDF (Binomial b) Integer
=> CDF (Binomial b) Float
where cdf (Binomial t p) = floatingBinomialCDF t p
|])