massiv-0.2.7.0: src/Data/Massiv/Array/Numeric/Integral.hs
{-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
module Data.Massiv.Array.Numeric.Integral
(
-- $integral_intro
--
-- * Integral Approximation
-- ** Midpoint Rule
midpointRule
, midpointStencil
-- ** Trapezoid Rule
, trapezoidRule
, trapezoidStencil
-- ** Simpson's Rule
, simpsonsRule
, simpsonsStencil
-- * General Integral approximation
, integrateWith
, integralApprox
-- * From functions
-- ** Sampled at the edge
, fromFunction
-- ** Sampled at the midpoint
, fromFunctionMidpoint
) where
import Data.Coerce
import Data.Massiv.Array.Delayed
import Data.Massiv.Array.Manifest.Internal
import Data.Massiv.Array.Ops.Transform (extract')
import Data.Massiv.Array.Stencil
import Data.Massiv.Core.Common
-- |
--
-- __Midpoint Rule__
--
-- \[
-- \int_{{\,a}}^{{\,b}}{{f\left( x \right)\,dx}} \approx \Delta x \cdot \,f\left( {x_1 + \frac{\Delta x}{2}} \right) + \Delta x \cdot \,f\left( {x_2 + \frac{\Delta x}{2}} \right) + \cdots + \Delta x \cdot \,f\left( {x_n + \frac{\Delta x}{2}} \right)
-- \]
midpointStencil ::
(Fractional e, Index ix)
=> e -- ^ @Δx@ - distance between sample points
-> Dim -- ^ Dimension along which to integrate
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - number of sample points.
-> Stencil ix e e
midpointStencil dx dim k =
makeStencilDef 0 (setDim' (pureIndex 1) dim k) zeroIndex $ \g ->
pure dx * loop 0 (< k) (+ 1) 0 (\i -> (+ g (setDim' zeroIndex dim i)))
{-# INLINE midpointStencil #-}
-- |
--
-- __Trapezoid Rule__
--
-- \[
-- \int_{{\,a}}^{{\,b}}{{f\left( x \right)\,dx}} \approx \frac{{\Delta x}}{2}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_0}} \right) + f\left( {{x_1}} \right)} \right) + \frac{{\Delta x}}{2}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_1}} \right) + f\left( {{x_2}} \right)} \right) + \cdots + \frac{{\Delta x}}{2}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_{n - 1}}} \right) + f\left( {{x_n}} \right)} \right)
-- \]
trapezoidStencil ::
(Fractional e, Index ix)
=> e -- ^ @Δx@ - distance between sample points
-> Dim -- ^ Dimension along which to integrate
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - number of sample points.
-> Stencil ix e e
trapezoidStencil dx dim n =
makeStencilDef 0 (setDim' (pureIndex 1) dim (n + 1)) zeroIndex $ \g ->
pure dx / 2 *
(loop 1 (< n) (+ 1) (g zeroIndex) (\i -> (+ 2 * g (setDim' zeroIndex dim i))) +
g (setDim' zeroIndex dim n))
{-# INLINE trapezoidStencil #-}
-- |
--
-- __Simpson's Rule__
--
-- \[
-- \int_{{\,a}}^{{\,b}}{{f\left( x \right)\,dx}} \approx \frac{{\Delta x}}{3}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_0}} \right) + 4\cdot f\left( {{x_1}} \right) + f\left( {{x_2}} \right)} \right) + \frac{{\Delta x}}{3}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_2}} \right) + 4\cdot f\left( {{x_3}} \right) + f\left( {{x_4}} \right)} \right) + \cdots + \frac{{\Delta x}}{3}\cdot\left( {f\left( {{x_{n - 2}}} \right) + 4\cdot f\left( {{x_{n - 1}}} \right) + f\left( {{x_n}} \right)} \right)
-- \]
simpsonsStencil ::
(Fractional e, Index ix)
=> e -- ^ @Δx@ - distance between sample points
-> Dim -- ^ Dimension along which to integrate
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - Number of sample points. This value should be even, otherwise error.
-> Stencil ix e e
simpsonsStencil dx dim n
| odd n =
error $
"Number of sample points for Simpson's rule stencil should be even, but received: " ++ show n
| otherwise =
makeStencilDef 0 (setDim' (pureIndex 1) dim (n + 1)) zeroIndex $ \g ->
let simAcc i (prev, acc) =
let !fx3 = g (setDim' zeroIndex dim (i + 2))
!newAcc = acc + prev + 4 * g (setDim' zeroIndex dim (i + 1)) + fx3
in (fx3, newAcc)
in pure dx / 3 * snd (loop 2 (< n - 1) (+ 2) (simAcc 0 (g zeroIndex, 0)) simAcc)
{-# INLINE simpsonsStencil #-}
-- | Integrate with a stencil along a particular dimension.
integrateWith ::
(Fractional e, Load DW ix e, Mutable r ix e)
=> (Dim -> Int -> Stencil ix e e)
-> Dim -- ^ Dimension along which integration should be estimated.
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - Number of samples
-> Array r ix e
-> Array r ix e
integrateWith stencil dim n arr =
computeWithStride (Stride nsz) $ mapStencil (Fill 0) (stencil dim n) arr
where
!nsz = setDim' (pureIndex 1) dim n
{-# INLINE integrateWith #-}
-- | Compute an approximation of integral using a supplied rule in a form of `Stencil`.
integralApprox ::
(Fractional e, Load DW ix e, Mutable r ix e)
=> (e -> Dim -> Int -> Stencil ix e e) -- ^ Integration Stencil
-> e -- ^ @d@ - Length of interval per cell
-> Sz ix -- ^ @sz@ - Result size of the matrix
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - Number of samples
-> Array r ix e -- ^ Array with values of @f(x,y,..)@ that will be used as source for integration.
-> Array M ix e
integralApprox stencil d sz n arr =
extract' zeroIndex sz $ toManifest $ loop 1 (<= coerce (dimensions sz)) (+ 1) arr applyStencil
where
!dx = d / fromIntegral n
applyStencil dim = integrateWith (stencil dx) (Dim dim) n
{-# INLINE applyStencil #-}
{-# INLINE integralApprox #-}
-- | Use midpoint rule to approximate an integral.
midpointRule ::
(Fractional e, Load DW ix e, Mutable r ix e)
=> Comp -- ^ Computation strategy.
-> r -- ^ Intermediate array representation.
-> ((Int -> e) -> ix -> e) -- ^ @f(x,y,...)@ - Function to integrate
-> e -- ^ @a@ - Starting value point.
-> e -- ^ @d@ - Distance per matrix cell.
-> Sz ix -- ^ @sz@ - Result matrix size.
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - Number of sample points per cell in each direction.
-> Array M ix e
midpointRule comp r f a d sz n =
integralApprox midpointStencil d sz n $ computeAs r $ fromFunctionMidpoint comp f a d sz n
{-# INLINE midpointRule #-}
-- | Use trapezoid rule to approximate an integral.
trapezoidRule ::
(Fractional e, Load DW ix e, Mutable r ix e)
=> Comp -- ^ Computation strategy
-> r -- ^ Intermediate array representation
-> ((Int -> e) -> ix -> e) -- ^ @f(x,y,...)@ - function to integrate
-> e -- ^ @a@ - starting point
-> e -- ^ @d@ - distance per matrix cell
-> Sz ix -- ^ @sz@ - end matrix size
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - number of sample points per cell in each direction
-> Array M ix e
trapezoidRule comp r f a d sz n =
integralApprox trapezoidStencil d sz n $ computeAs r $ fromFunction comp f a d sz n
{-# INLINE trapezoidRule #-}
-- | Use Simpson's rule to approximate an integral.
simpsonsRule ::
(Fractional e, Load DW ix e, Mutable r ix e)
=> Comp -- ^ Computation strategy
-> r -- ^ Intermediate array representation
-> ((Int -> e) -> ix -> e) -- ^ @f(x,y,...)@ - function to integrate
-> e -- ^ @a@ - starting point
-> e -- ^ @d@ - distance per matrix cell
-> Sz ix -- ^ @sz@ - end matrix size
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - number of sample points per cell in each direction. This value must be even,
-- otherwise error..
-> Array M ix e
simpsonsRule comp r f a d sz n =
integralApprox simpsonsStencil d sz n $ computeAs r $ fromFunction comp f a d sz n
{-# INLINE simpsonsRule #-}
-- | Create an array from a function with sample points at the edges
--
-- >>> fromFunction Seq (\ scale (i :. j) -> scale i + scale j) (-2) 1 (4 :. 4) 2
-- (Array D Seq (9 :. 9)
-- [ [ -4.0,-3.5,-3.0,-2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0 ]
-- , [ -3.5,-3.0,-2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5 ]
-- , [ -3.0,-2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0 ]
-- , [ -2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5 ]
-- , [ -2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0 ]
-- , [ -1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5 ]
-- , [ -1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.0 ]
-- , [ -0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.0,3.5 ]
-- , [ 0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.0,3.5,4.0 ]
-- ])
--
fromFunction ::
(Index ix, Fractional a)
=> Comp -- ^ Computation strategy
-> ((Int -> a) -> ix -> e)
-- ^ A function that will produce elements of scaled up array. First argument is a scaling
-- function that should be applied to individual indicies.
-> a -- ^ @a@ - Starting point
-> a -- ^ @d@ - Distance per cell
-> Sz ix -- ^ @sz@ - Size of the desired array
-> Int -- ^ @n@ - Scaling factor, i.e. number of sample points per cell.
-> Array D ix e
fromFunction comp f a d sz n =
fmap (\ix -> f scale ix) $ range' comp zeroIndex (liftIndex (n *) sz)
where
nFrac = fromIntegral n
scale i = a + d * fromIntegral i / nFrac
{-# INLINE scale #-}
{-# INLINE fromFunction #-}
-- | Similar to `fromFunction`, but will create an array from a function with sample points in the
-- middle of cells.
--
-- >>> fromFunctionMidpoint Seq (\ scale (i :. j) -> scale i + scale j) (-2) 1 (4 :. 4) 2
-- (Array D Seq (8 :. 8)
-- [ [ -3.5,-3.0,-2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0 ]
-- , [ -3.0,-2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5 ]
-- , [ -2.5,-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0 ]
-- , [ -2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5 ]
-- , [ -1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0 ]
-- , [ -1.0,-0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5 ]
-- , [ -0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.0 ]
-- , [ 0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.0,3.5 ]
-- ])
--
fromFunctionMidpoint
:: (Index ix, Fractional a) =>
Comp -> ((Int -> a) -> ix -> e) -> a -> a -> ix -> Int -> Array D ix e
fromFunctionMidpoint comp f a d sz n =
fmap (\ix -> f scale ix) $ range' comp zeroIndex (liftIndex (\i -> n * i - 1) sz)
where
nFrac = fromIntegral n
dx2 = d / nFrac / 2
scale i = dx2 + a + d * fromIntegral i / nFrac
{-# INLINE scale #-}
{-# INLINE fromFunctionMidpoint #-}
-- TODO: make this function external
-- https://github.com/lehins/massiv/issues/47
range' :: Index ix => Comp -> ix -> ix -> Array D ix ix
range' comp ixFrom ixTo =
makeArray comp sz (\ix -> liftIndex2 (+) ixFrom ix)
where
sz = liftIndex2 (-) (liftIndex (+ 1) ixTo) ixFrom
{-# INLINE range' #-}
-- $integral_intro
--
-- Inspiration for the code in this module was taken from [Paul Dawkins Online
-- Notes](http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu). In particular the page on [Integral
-- Approximation](http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ApproximatingDefIntegrals.aspx),
-- so if you need to brush up on some theory it is a great place to start.
--
-- Implementation-wise, integral approximation here relies heavily on stencils with stride, as such
-- computation is fast and is automatically parallelizable.
--
-- Here are some example of where this can be useful:
--
-- === Integral of a function on a region
--
-- Say we have a gaussian @f(x) = e^(x^2)@ on interval @[0, 2]@ (as in Paul's tutorial above). For
-- this we define a function @f@, an array with equally spaced (/dx/) sample input values and apply
-- the function to that array, which will give us an array of @n + 1@ sample points, or looking from
-- a different angle @n@ intervals.
--
-- >>> f x = exp ( x ^ 2 )
-- >>> fromFunction Seq (\ scale x -> f (scale x)) 0 2 1 4
-- (Array D Seq (5)
-- [ 1.0,1.2840254166877414,2.718281828459045,9.487735836358526,54.598150033144236 ])
--
-- Once we have that array of sample points ready we could use `integralApprox` and one of the
-- stencils to compute an integral, but there are already functions that will do both steps for you:
--
-- >>> simpsonsRule Seq U (\ scale x -> f (scale x)) 0 2 1 4
-- [ 17.353626450374566 ])
--
-- Scaling function @scale@ is what will change an array index into equally spaced and
-- appropriately shifted values of @x, y, ...@ before they can get applied to @f(x, y, ...)@
--
-- === Accurate values of a function
--
-- Another very useful place where integral approximation can be used is when a more accurate
-- representation of a non-linear function is desired. Consider the same gaussian function applied
-- to equally spaced values, with zero being in the middle of the vector:
--
-- >>> xArr = makeArrayR D Seq (Ix1 4) $ \ i -> (fromIntegral i - 1.5 :: Float)
-- >>> xArr
-- (Array D Seq (4)
-- [ -1.5,-0.5,0.5,1.5 ])
-- >>> fmap f xArr
-- (Array D Seq (4)
-- [ 9.487736,1.2840254,1.2840254,9.487736 ])
--
-- The problem with above example is that computed values do not accurately represent the total
-- value contained within each vector cell. For that reason if your were to later use it for example
-- as convolution stencil, approximation would be very poor. The way to solve it is to approximate
-- an integral across each cell of vector by drastically blowing up the `xArr` and then reducing it
-- to a smaller array by using one of the approximation rules:
--
-- >>> startValue = -2 :: Float
-- >>> distPerCell = 1 :: Float
-- >>> desiredSize = 4 :: Ix1
-- >>> numSamples = 4 :: Int
-- >>> xArrX4 = fromFunction Seq ($) startValue distPerCell desiredSize numSamples
-- >>> xArrX4
-- (Array D Seq (17)
-- [ -2.0,-1.75,-1.5,-1.25,-1.0,-0.75,-0.5,-0.25,0.0,0.25,0.5,0.75,1.0,1.25,1.5,1.75,2.0 ])
-- >>> yArrX4 = computeAs U $ fmap f xArrX4
-- >>> integralApprox trapezoidStencil distPerCell desiredSize numSamples yArrX4
-- (Array M Seq (4)
-- [ 16.074406,1.4906789,1.4906789,16.074408 ])
--
-- We can clearly see the difference is huge, but it doesn't mean it is much better than our
-- previous estimate. In order to get more accurate results we can use a better Simpson's rule for
-- approximation and many more sample points. There is no need to create individual arrays `xArr`
-- and `yArr`, there are functions like `simpsonRule` that will take care it for you:
--
-- >>> simpsonsRule Seq U (\ scale i -> f (scale i)) startValue distPerCell desiredSize 128
-- (Array M Seq (4)
-- [ 14.989977,1.4626511,1.4626517,14.989977 ])