liquidhaskell-0.8.2.0: docs/slides/flops14/lhs/03_HigherOrderFunctions.lhs
{#hofs}
=========
<div class="hidden">
\begin{code}
module Loop (
listSum
, sumNats
) where
import Prelude
{-@ LIQUID "--no-termination"@-}
sumNats :: [Int] -> Int
add :: Int -> Int -> Int
\end{code}
</div>
Higher-Order Specifications
---------------------------
Types scale to *Higher-Order* Specifications
<br>
<div class="fragment">
+ map
+ fold
+ visitors
+ callbacks
+ ...
</div>
<br>
<div class="fragment">Very difficult with *first-order program logics*</div>
Higher Order Specifications
===========================
Example: Higher Order Loop
--------------------------
<br>
\begin{code}
loop :: Int -> Int -> α -> (Int -> α -> α) -> α
loop lo hi base f = go lo base
where
go i acc
| i < hi = go (i+1) (f i acc)
| otherwise = acc
\end{code}
<br>
LiquidHaskell infers `f` called with values `(Btwn lo hi)`
Example: Summing Lists
----------------------
\begin{code}
listSum :: [Int] -> Int
listSum xs = loop 0 n 0 body
where
body = \i acc -> acc + (xs !! i)
n = length xs
\end{code}
<br>
<div class="fragment">
**Function Subtyping**
+ `body` called with `i :: Btwn 0 (llen xs)`
+ Hence, indexing with `!!` is safe.
</div>
<div class="fragment">
<a href="http://goto.ucsd.edu:8090/index.html#?demo=Loop.hs" target= "_blank">Demo:</a> Tweak `loop` exit condition?
</div>
Polymorphic Instantiation
=========================
{#poly}
--------
Example: Summing `Nat`s
-----------------------
\begin{code}
{-@ sumNats :: [Nat] -> Nat @-}
sumNats xs = foldl (+) 0 xs
\end{code}
<br>
<div class="fragment">
\begin{code} Recall
foldl :: (α -> β -> α) -> α -> [β] -> α
\end{code}
</div>
<br>
<div class="fragment">
How to **instantiate** `α` and `β` ?
</div>
Function Subtyping
------------------
\begin{code}<div/>
(+) :: x:Int -> y:Int -> {v:Int|v=x+y}
<: Nat -> Nat -> Nat
\end{code}
<br>
<div class="fragment">
Because,
\begin{code}<div/>
|- Nat <: Int -- Contra
x:Nat, y:Nat |- {v = x+y} <: Nat -- Co
\end{code}
</div>
<br>
<div class="fragment">
Because,
\begin{code}<div/>
0<=x && 0<=y && v = x+y => 0 <= v
\end{code}
</div>
Example: Summing `Nat`s
-----------------------
\begin{code} <div/>
{-@ sumNats :: [Nat] -> Nat @-}
sumNats xs = foldl (+) 0 xs
\end{code}
<br>
\begin{code} Where:
foldl :: (α -> β -> α) -> α -> [β] -> α
(+) :: Nat -> Nat -> Nat
\end{code}
<br>
<div class="fragment">
`sumNats` verified by **instantiating** `α,β := Nat`
</div>
<br>
<div class="fragment">
`α` is **loop invariant**, instantiation is invariant **synthesis**
</div>
Instantiation And Inference
---------------------------
Polymorphic instantiation happens *everywhere*...
<br>
... so *automatic inference* is crucial
<br>
Cannot use *unification* (unlike indexed approaches)
<br>
LiquidHaskell uses [SMT and Abstract Interpretation.](http://goto.ucsd.edu/~rjhala/papers/liquid_types.html)
Iteration Dependence
--------------------
**Problem:** Cannot use parametric polymorphism to verify
<br>
\begin{code}
{-@ add :: n:Nat -> m:Nat -> {v:Nat|v=m+n} @-}
add n m = loop 0 m n (\_ i -> i + 1)
\end{code}
<br>
<div class="fragment">
As property only holds after **last iteration** ...
... cannot instantiate `α := {v:Int | v = n + m}`
</div>
<br>
<div class="fragment">
**Problem:** Need *iteration-dependent* invariants... [[Continue]](04_AbstractRefinements.lhs.slides.html)
</div>