lambdabot-4.0: scripts/Djinn/tests/ljt/con_p.010.ljt
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : con_p10 : Dyckhoff's benchmark formulae (1997)
% Domain : Syntactic
% Problem : Formulae requiring many contractions
% Version : Especial.
% Problem formulation : Intuit. Valid Size 10
% English : (((&&_{i=1..N} p(i)) | (||_{i=1..N} (p(i)=>f)))=>f)=>f
% Refs : [Dyc97] Roy Dyckhoff. Some benchmark formulae for
% intuitionistic propositional logic. At
% http://www.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~rd/logic/marks.html
% : [Fr88] T. Franzen, Algorithmic Aspects of intuitionistic
% propositional logic, SICS Research Report R87010B,
% 1988.
% : [Fr89] T. Franzen, Algorithmic Aspects of intuitionistic
% propositional logic II, SICS Research Report
% R-89/89006, 1989.
% Source : [Dyc97]
% Names :
% Status : Theorem
% Rating : 0.60 v 1.0
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 2 ( 1 unit)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equality)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 7 average)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 0 ~ ; 10 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=)
% ( 0 <~>; 0 ~|; 0 ~&)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 11 propositional; 0-0 arity)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 constant; --- arity)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 singleton; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 average)
% Comments : "proof in LJ needs n contractions" [Dyc97]
% : tptp2X -f ljt con_p.010.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
f((
% axiom1, axiom.
(( ( ( p1 & ( p2 & ( p3 & ( p4 & ( p5 & ( p6 & ( p7 & ( p8 & ( p9 & p10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v ( ( p1 -> f ) v ( ( p2 -> f ) v ( ( p3 -> f ) v ( ( p4 -> f ) v ( ( p5 -> f ) v ( ( p6 -> f ) v ( ( p7 -> f ) v ( ( p8 -> f ) v ( ( p9 -> f ) v ( p10 -> f ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -> f ))
->
% conjecture_name, conjecture.
(f)
)).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------