json-tokens-0.1.0.1: json-tokens.cabal

cabal-version: 2.2
name: json-tokens
version: 0.1.0.1
synopsis: Tokenize JSON
description:
  Convert JSON to a token stream. This libary focuses on
  high performance and minimal allocations. This library
  is distinguished from `aeson` in the following ways:
  .
  * In `aeson`, `decode` parses JSON by building an AST
    that resembles the ABNF given in RFC 7159. Notably,
    this converts every JSON `object` to a `HashMap`.
    (This choice of intermediate data structure may not
    be appropritae depending on how the user wants to
    interpret the `object`). By constrast, `json-tokens`
    converts a document to a token sequence.
  .
  * For numbers, `aeson` uses `scientific`, but `json-tokens`
    uses `scientific-notation`. Although `scientific` and
    `scientific-notation` have similar APIs, `scientific-notation`
    includes a parser that is about 4x faster and conversion
    functions that are 10x faster than those found in
    `scientific` and `aeson`.
  .
  * For text, `aeson` uses the UTF-16-backed `text` library,
    but `json-tokens` uses the UTF-8-backed `text-short`
    library.
  .
  * Parsing is resumable in `aeson`, which uses `attoparsec`,
    but not in `json-tokens`, which uses `bytesmith`.
  .
  * In `aeson`, all batteries are included. In particular,
    the combination of typeclasses and GHC Generics
    (or Template Haskell) make it possible to elide lots of
    boilerplate. None of these are included in `json-tokens`.
  .
  The difference in design decisions means that solutions using
  `json-tokens` are able to decode JSON twice as fast as
  solutions with `aeson. In the `zeek-json` benchmark suite,
  a `json-tokens`-based decoding outperforms `aeson`'s `decode`
  by a factor of two. This speed comes at a cost. Users must
  write more code to use `json-tokens` than they do for `aeson`.
  If high-throughput parsing of small JSON documents is paramount,
  this cost may be worth bearing. It is always possible to go a
  step further and forego tokenization entirely, parsing the
  desired Haskell data type directly from a byte sequence. Doing this
  in a low-allocation way while retaining both the ability the
  handle JSON `object` keys in any order and the ability to handle
  escape sequences in `object` keys is fiendishly difficult. Kudos
  to the brave soul that goes down that path. For the rest of us,
  `json-tokens` is a compromise worth considering.

homepage: https://github.com/andrewthad/json-tokens
bug-reports: https://github.com/andrewthad/json-tokens/issues
license: BSD-3-Clause
license-file: LICENSE
author: Andrew Martin
maintainer: andrew.thaddeus@gmail.com
copyright: 2019 Andrew Martin
category: Data
extra-source-files: CHANGELOG.md

library
  exposed-modules: Json.Token
  build-depends:
    , base >=4.12 && <5
    , bytestring >=0.10.8 && <0.11
    , array-builder >=0.1 && <0.2
    , text-short >=0.1.3 && <0.2
    , bytesmith >=0.3 && <0.4
    , primitive >=0.7 && <0.8
    , byteslice >=0.1.3 && <0.2
    , array-chunks >=0.1.1 && <0.2
    , scientific-notation >=0.1 && <0.2
  hs-source-dirs: src
  default-language: Haskell2010
  ghc-options: -Wall -O2

test-suite test
  default-language: Haskell2010
  type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
  hs-source-dirs: test, common
  main-is: Main.hs
  other-modules:
    Twitter1
    Twitter10
    Twitter100
  ghc-options: -Wall -O2
  build-depends:
    , QuickCheck >=2.13.1 && <2.14
    , base >=4.12.0.0 && <5
    , byteslice
    , bytestring
    , json-tokens
    , neat-interpolation >=0.3.2
    , primitive
    , scientific-notation >=0.1
    , small-bytearray-builder
    , tasty >=1.2.3 && <1.3
    , tasty-hunit >=0.10.0.2 && <0.11
    , text >=1.2
    , vector

benchmark bench
  type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
  build-depends:
    , base
    , byteslice
    , bytestring
    , gauge
    , json-tokens
    , neat-interpolation >=0.3.2
    , primitive
    , text >=1.2
    , scientific-notation >=0.1
  ghc-options: -Wall -O2
  default-language: Haskell2010
  hs-source-dirs: bench, common
  main-is: Main.hs
  other-modules:
    Twitter1
    Twitter10
    Twitter100