hermit-0.6.0.0: src/HERMIT/Dictionary/WorkerWrapper/Common.hs
{-# LANGUAGE CPP, DeriveDataTypeable, TypeFamilies #-}
module HERMIT.Dictionary.WorkerWrapper.Common
( externals
, WWAssumptionTag(..)
, WWAssumption(..)
, assumptionAEqualityT
, assumptionBEqualityT
, assumptionCEqualityT
, split1BetaR
, split2BetaR
, workLabel
) where
import Control.Monad.IO.Class
import Data.String (fromString)
import Data.Typeable
import HERMIT.Context
import HERMIT.Core
import HERMIT.External
import HERMIT.GHC
import HERMIT.Kure
import HERMIT.Monad
import HERMIT.ParserCore
import HERMIT.Dictionary.Common
import HERMIT.Dictionary.Function hiding (externals)
import HERMIT.Dictionary.Reasoning hiding (externals)
import HERMIT.Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- | New Worker/Wrapper-related externals.
externals :: [External]
externals = map (.+ Proof)
[ external "intro-ww-assumption-A"
(\nm absC repC -> do
eq <- parse2BeforeT assumptionAEqualityT absC repC
insertLemmaR nm $ Lemma eq False False :: RewriteH Core)
[ "Introduce a lemma for worker/wrapper assumption A"
, "using given abs and rep functions." ]
, external "intro-ww-assumption-B"
(\nm absC repC bodyC -> do
eq <- parse3BeforeT assumptionBEqualityT absC repC bodyC
insertLemmaR nm $ Lemma eq False False :: RewriteH Core)
[ "Introduce a lemma for worker/wrapper assumption B"
, "using given abs, rep, and body functions." ]
, external "intro-ww-assumption-C"
(\nm absC repC bodyC -> do
eq <- parse3BeforeT assumptionCEqualityT absC repC bodyC
insertLemmaR nm $ Lemma eq False False :: RewriteH Core)
[ "Introduce a lemma for worker/wrapper assumption C"
, "using given abs, rep, and body functions." ]
, external "split-1-beta" (\ nm absC -> promoteExprR . parse2BeforeT (split1BetaR nm) absC :: CoreString -> RewriteH Core)
[ "split-1-beta <name> <abs expression> <rep expression>"
, "Perform worker/wrapper split with condition 1-beta."
, "Given lemma name argument is used as prefix to two introduced lemmas."
, " <name>-assumption: unproven lemma for w/w assumption C."
, " <name>-fusion: assumed lemma for w/w fusion."
]
, external "split-2-beta" (\ nm absC -> promoteExprR . parse2BeforeT (split2BetaR nm) absC :: CoreString -> RewriteH Core)
[ "split-2-beta <name> <abs expression> <rep expression>"
, "Perform worker/wrapper split with condition 2-beta."
, "Given lemma name argument is used as prefix to two introduced lemmas."
, " <name>-assumption: unproven lemma for w/w assumption C."
, " <name>-fusion: assumed lemma for w/w fusion."
]
]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
data WWAssumptionTag = A | B | C deriving (Eq,Ord,Show,Read,Typeable)
instance Extern WWAssumptionTag where
type Box WWAssumptionTag = WWAssumptionTag
box i = i
unbox i = i
data WWAssumption = WWAssumption WWAssumptionTag (RewriteH CoreExpr)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Note: The current approach to WW Fusion is a hack.
-- I'm not sure what the best way to approach this is though.
-- An alternative would be to have a generate command that adds ww-fusion to the dictionary, all preconditions verified in advance.
-- That would have to exist at the Shell level though.
-- This isn't entirely safe, as a malicious the user could define a label with this name.
workLabel :: RememberedName
workLabel = fromString "recursive-definition-of-work-for-use-by-ww-fusion"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Given abs and rep expressions, build "abs . rep = id"
assumptionAEqualityT :: ( BoundVars c, HasDynFlags m, HasHermitMEnv m, HasHscEnv m
, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m, MonadThings m )
=> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Transform c m x Equality
assumptionAEqualityT absE repE = prefixFailMsg "Building assumption A failed: " $ do
comp <- buildCompositionT absE repE
let (_,compBody) = collectTyBinders comp
(tvs, xTy, _) <- splitFunTypeM (exprType comp)
idE <- buildIdT xTy
return $ Equality tvs compBody idE
-- Given abs, rep, and f expressions, build "abs . rep . f = f"
assumptionBEqualityT :: ( BoundVars c, HasDynFlags m, HasHermitMEnv m, HasHscEnv m
, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m, MonadThings m)
=> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Transform c m x Equality
assumptionBEqualityT absE repE fE = prefixFailMsg "Building assumption B failed: " $ do
repAfterF <- buildCompositionT repE fE
comp <- buildCompositionT absE repAfterF
let (tvs,lhs) = collectTyBinders comp
rhs <- appArgM 5 lhs >>= appArgM 5 -- get f with proper tvs applied
return $ Equality tvs lhs rhs
-- Given abs, rep, and f expressions, build "fix (abs . rep . f) = fix f"
assumptionCEqualityT :: (BoundVars c, HasDynFlags m, HasHermitMEnv m, HasHscEnv m, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m, MonadThings m)
=> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Transform c m x Equality
assumptionCEqualityT absE repE fE = prefixFailMsg "Building assumption C failed: " $ do
Equality vs lhs rhs <- assumptionBEqualityT absE repE fE
lhs' <- buildFixT lhs
rhs' <- buildFixT rhs
return $ Equality vs lhs' rhs'
-- Given abs, rep, and 'fix g' expressions, build "rep (abs (fix g)) = fix g"
wwFusionEqualityT :: (HasDynFlags m, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m)
=> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Transform c m x Equality
wwFusionEqualityT absE repE fixgE = prefixFailMsg "Building worker/wrapper fusion lemma failed: " $ do
protoLhs <- buildApplicationM repE =<< buildApplicationM absE fixgE
let (tvs, lhs) = collectTyBinders protoLhs
-- This way, the rhs is applied to the proper type variables.
rhs <- case lhs of
(App _ (App _ rhs)) -> return rhs
_ -> fail "lhs malformed"
return $ Equality tvs lhs rhs
-- Perform the worker/wrapper split using condition 1-beta, introducing
-- an unproven lemma for assumption C, and an appropriate w/w fusion lemma.
split1BetaR :: ( BoundVars c, HasDynFlags m, HasHermitMEnv m, HasHscEnv m, HasLemmas m
, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m, MonadThings m, MonadUnique m )
=> LemmaName -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Rewrite c m CoreExpr
split1BetaR nm absE repE = do
(_fixId, [_tyA, f]) <- callNameT $ fromString "Data.Function.fix"
g <- buildCompositionT repE =<< buildCompositionT f absE
gId <- constT $ newIdH "g" $ exprType g
workRhs <- buildFixT $ varToCoreExpr gId
workId <- constT $ newIdH "worker" $ exprType workRhs
newRhs <- buildApplicationM absE (varToCoreExpr workId)
assumptionEq <- assumptionCEqualityT absE repE f
_ <- insertLemmaR (fromString (show nm ++ "-assumption")) $ Lemma assumptionEq False True -- unproven, used
wwFusionEq <- wwFusionEqualityT absE repE workRhs
_ <- insertLemmaR (fromString (show nm ++ "-fusion")) $ Lemma wwFusionEq True False -- proven (assumed), unused
return $ mkCoreLets [NonRec gId g, NonRec workId workRhs] newRhs
split2BetaR :: ( BoundVars c, HasDynFlags m, HasHermitMEnv m, HasHscEnv m, HasLemmas m
, MonadCatch m, MonadIO m, MonadThings m, MonadUnique m )
=> LemmaName -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> Rewrite c m CoreExpr
split2BetaR nm absE repE = do
(_fixId, [_tyA, f]) <- callNameT $ fromString "Data.Function.fix"
fixfE <- idR
repFixFE <- buildApplicationM repE fixfE
workId <- constT $ newIdH "worker" $ exprType repFixFE
newRhs <- buildApplicationM absE (varToCoreExpr workId)
assumptionEq <- assumptionCEqualityT absE repE f
_ <- insertLemmaR (fromString (show nm ++ "-assumption")) $ Lemma assumptionEq False True -- unproven, used
wwFusionEq <- wwFusionEqualityT absE repE (varToCoreExpr workId)
_ <- insertLemmaR (fromString (show nm ++ "-fusion")) $ Lemma wwFusionEq True False -- proven (assumed), unused
return $ mkCoreLets [NonRec workId repFixFE] newRhs