algebraic-graphs-0.0.4: src/Algebra/Graph/Relation/Internal.hs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- |
-- Module : Algebra.Graph.Relation.Internal
-- Copyright : (c) Andrey Mokhov 2016-2017
-- License : MIT (see the file LICENSE)
-- Maintainer : andrey.mokhov@gmail.com
-- Stability : unstable
--
-- This module exposes the implementation of the 'Relation' data type. The API
-- is unstable and unsafe. Where possible use the non-internal module
-- "Algebra.Graph.Relation" instead.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
module Algebra.Graph.Relation.Internal (
-- * Binary relation implementation
Relation (..), consistent, setProduct, referredToVertexSet
) where
import Data.Set (Set, union)
import Algebra.Graph.Class
import qualified Data.Set as Set
{-| The 'Relation' data type represents a graph as a /binary relation/. We
define a 'Num' instance as a convenient notation for working with graphs:
> 0 == vertex 0
> 1 + 2 == overlay (vertex 1) (vertex 2)
> 1 * 2 == connect (vertex 1) (vertex 2)
> 1 + 2 * 3 == overlay (vertex 1) (connect (vertex 2) (vertex 3))
> 1 * (2 + 3) == connect (vertex 1) (overlay (vertex 2) (vertex 3))
The 'Show' instance is defined using basic graph construction primitives:
@show (empty :: Relation Int) == "empty"
show (1 :: Relation Int) == "vertex 1"
show (1 + 2 :: Relation Int) == "vertices [1,2]"
show (1 * 2 :: Relation Int) == "edge 1 2"
show (1 * 2 * 3 :: Relation Int) == "edges [(1,2),(1,3),(2,3)]"
show (1 * 2 + 3 :: Relation Int) == "graph [1,2,3] [(1,2)]"@
The 'Eq' instance satisfies all axioms of algebraic graphs:
* 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.overlay' is commutative and associative:
> x + y == y + x
> x + (y + z) == (x + y) + z
* 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.connect' is associative and has
'Algebra.Graph.Relation.empty' as the identity:
> x * empty == x
> empty * x == x
> x * (y * z) == (x * y) * z
* 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.connect' distributes over
'Algebra.Graph.Relation.overlay':
> x * (y + z) == x * y + x * z
> (x + y) * z == x * z + y * z
* 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.connect' can be decomposed:
> x * y * z == x * y + x * z + y * z
The following useful theorems can be proved from the above set of axioms.
* 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.overlay' has 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.empty' as the
identity and is idempotent:
> x + empty == x
> empty + x == x
> x + x == x
* Absorption and saturation of 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.connect':
> x * y + x + y == x * y
> x * x * x == x * x
When specifying the time and memory complexity of graph algorithms, /n/ and /m/
will denote the number of vertices and edges in the graph, respectively.
-}
data Relation a = Relation {
-- | The /domain/ of the relation.
domain :: Set a,
-- | The set of pairs of elements that are /related/. It is guaranteed that
-- each element belongs to the domain.
relation :: Set (a, a)
} deriving Eq
instance (Ord a, Show a) => Show (Relation a) where
show (Relation d r)
| vs == [] = "empty"
| es == [] = if Set.size d > 1 then "vertices " ++ show vs
else "vertex " ++ show v
| d == referred = if Set.size r > 1 then "edges " ++ show es
else "edge " ++ show e ++ " " ++ show f
| otherwise = "graph " ++ show vs ++ " " ++ show es
where
vs = Set.toAscList d
es = Set.toAscList r
v = head vs
(e, f) = head es
referred = referredToVertexSet r
instance Ord a => Graph (Relation a) where
type Vertex (Relation a) = a
empty = Relation Set.empty Set.empty
vertex x = Relation (Set.singleton x) Set.empty
overlay x y = Relation (domain x `union` domain y) (relation x `union` relation y)
connect x y = Relation (domain x `union` domain y) (relation x `union` relation y
`union` (domain x `setProduct` domain y))
-- | Compute the Cartesian product of two sets. /Note: this function is for internal use only/.
setProduct :: Set a -> Set b -> Set (a, b)
setProduct x y = Set.fromDistinctAscList [ (a, b) | a <- Set.toAscList x, b <- Set.toAscList y ]
instance (Ord a, Num a) => Num (Relation a) where
fromInteger = vertex . fromInteger
(+) = overlay
(*) = connect
signum = const empty
abs = id
negate = id
-- | Check if the internal representation of a relation is consistent, i.e. if all
-- pairs of elements in the 'relation' refer to existing elements in the 'domain'.
-- It should be impossible to create an inconsistent 'Relation', and we use this
-- function in testing.
-- /Note: this function is for internal use only/.
--
-- @
-- consistent 'Algebra.Graph.Relation.empty' == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.vertex' x) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.overlay' x y) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.connect' x y) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.edge' x y) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.edges' xs) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.graph' xs ys) == True
-- consistent ('Algebra.Graph.Relation.fromAdjacencyList' xs) == True
-- @
consistent :: Ord a => Relation a -> Bool
consistent (Relation d r) = referredToVertexSet r `Set.isSubsetOf` d
-- | The set of elements that appear in a given set of pairs.
-- /Note: this function is for internal use only/.
referredToVertexSet :: Ord a => Set (a, a) -> Set a
referredToVertexSet = Set.fromList . uncurry (++) . unzip . Set.toAscList