diff --git a/reorderable.cabal b/reorderable.cabal
--- a/reorderable.cabal
+++ b/reorderable.cabal
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:               reorderable
-Version:            0.3
+Version:            0.3.1
 Cabal-Version:      >= 1.2
 Build-Type:         Simple
 License:            OtherLicense
@@ -12,22 +12,22 @@
 Category:           Type System, Data
 
 Description:
-    
+    .
     * Introduction.
-    
+    .
     The pair `(Int, Float)' is entirely distinct from the pair `(Float, Int)'
         and trying to use one in place of the other will give a type error.
         This is often, but not always, desired.
-    
+    .
     * Module.
-    
+    .
     This module provides more flexible sum and product types that do not enforce
         a single order on their elements.  This does introduce some necessary
         restrictions, for example only one instance of any type can appear in
         any given collection of types.  Additionally, all types that are to be
         used in one of these flexible containers must be pre-defined as
         `reorderable':
-    
+    .
     @
         data MyType1 = MyType1 Int
         data MyType2 = MyType2 Float
@@ -39,47 +39,47 @@
         reorderable ''MyType3
         reorderable ''MyType4
     @
-    
+    .
     That will, using /Template Haskell/, generate all the required instances to
         make those types usable as reorderable types within unordered
         containers.  Following that, all the declarations below are valid:
-    
+    .
     @
         type Reordered1A = ReorderableEnd :*: MyType2 :*: MyType1
         type Reordered1B = ReorderableEnd :*: MyType1 :*: MyType2
         type Reordered2  = Reordered1A    :*: MyType3
         type Reordered3  = ReorderableEnd :*: MyType4 :*: Reordered1B
     @
-    
+    .
     Types `Reordered1A' and `Reordered1B' are in fact now identical.  This does
         introduce a third limitation of the library I have been unable to lift -
         the use of `ReorderableEnd' as a sentinel in all reorderable containers.
-    
+    .
     It may be the case that `Type1' and `Type2' can be used together, as can
         `Type3' and `Type4', but the two sets of types can not be used in a
         container together.  These are /groups/ of types:
-    
+    .
     @
         reorderableGroup [''MyType1, ''MyType2]
         reorderableGroup [''MyType3, ''MyType4]
     @
-    
+    .
     The groups can overlap:
-    
+    .
     @
         reorderableGroup [''MyType1, ''MyType2]
         reorderableGroup [''MyType1, ''MyType3, ''MyType4]
     @
-    
+    .
     But this may cause some \"leakage\" where types from two different groups
         (for example `MyType2' and `MyType4') end up in the same container,
         attached via common types.
-    
+    .
     * Generation.
-    
+    .
     For each type `X' for which `reorderable' (or equivalent) is called, the
         following functions are generated (where `X' is the type name):
-    
+    .
     @
         addSumX :: (x :>: s) => s -> s :+: x
         setSumX :: (x :<: s) => x -> s -> s
@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@
         
         removeProductX :: (x :?: s) => s -> s :-: x
     @
-    
+    .
     ** Notes on the syntax:
-    
+    .
         * `:<:' Is read as \"Is member of sum type\".
         * `:>:' Is read as \"Is not member of sum type\".
         * `:+:' Is read as \"Plus\".
@@ -102,49 +102,49 @@
         * `:~:' Is read as \"Is not member of product type\".
         * `:*:' Is read as \"Product\".
         * `:-:' Is read as \"Remove\".
-    
+    .
     ** Notes on the functions:
-    
+    .
         * `addSumX' Adds the TYPE `x' to the given signature, and correctly
             re-wraps the contained data to reflect this new structure.  It does
             not add any data in to the structure itself because only one item
             may exist in the structure, and that item is already there.
-        
+        .
         * `setSumX' Changes what data is currently stored in the sum.  For a
             given concrete sum type `S', this can be called as:
             `setSumX x (undefined :: S)'.  An alternative version is simply:
             `setSumType (undefined :: S) x', in which `X :<: S'.  This is
             equivalent to the original `inj' function from `Data Types \'a la
             Carte', but has an explicit type proxy.
-        
+        .
         * `getSumX' Returns the data of type `Just X' IF it is the data
             currently being stored within the sum, otherwise it returns
             `Nothing'.  This is equivalent to the original `prj' function from
             `Data Types \'a la Carte'.
-        
+        .
         * `addProductX' Adds data of type `X' to an existing product type that
             does not yet contain any data of that type.
-        
+        .
         * `setProductX' Sets the data of type `X' in a product type that already
             contains data of that type.
-        
+        .
         * `getProductX' Gets the data of type `X' from a product type that
             contains data of that type.
-        
+        .
         * `removeProductX' Removes data of type `X' from a product type that
             contains data of that type, and rewraps the resulting information to
             remove `X' from the product's type.  There is no `removeSumX'
             function because the result is empty if the stored data is not of
             the type being removed.
-    
+    .
     * Generators.
-    
+    .
     In addition to being able to control for which types code is generated, you
         can control what code is generated for them through `reorderer's.  Note
         that the default code listed above is ALWAYS generated, you can
         currently only ADD to the generation code.  The simplest way to explain
         this is through an example:
-    
+    .
     @
         class ReorderableSum a
 
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
             getSum??? with = getSumType with (undefined :: ???)
         |]
     @
-    
+    .
     The code above is exactly the code used to generate the sum type functions
         documented above.  The internal class names are used in place of the
         type operator synonyms for simplicity.  `???' is used as a placeholder
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
         been generated (using `reify').  The simple reason for this is that
         placing the same type in two `reorderableGroup's will, without that
         check, attempt to instantiate this code twice and thus give errors.
-    
+    .
     What can be done within generators is very constrained.  For one thing, the
         parameter `a' to `ReorderableSum' currently MUST have kind `*', so any
         reorderable types may not have type parameters themselves (unless a new
@@ -179,11 +179,11 @@
         placeholder `???' in no way accounts for complex names - it is purely a
         text-based replacement, so trying to create a reorderable ``Maybe Int''
         type will result in the illegal:
-    
+    .
     @
         addSumMaybe Int :: ...
     @
-    
+    .
     Finally, this code is processed with \"haskell-src-meta\", and so any code
         must be parsable with that code.  One lifting of this restriction is
         that reorderers may additionally contain type family declarations, which
