pipes-text 0.0.0.13 → 0.0.0.14
raw patch · 2 files changed
+8/−290 lines, 2 filesdep ~textPVP: minor bump suggested
API additions: PVP suggests at least a minor version bump
Dependency ranges changed: text
API changes (from Hackage documentation)
+ Pipes.Text.IO: fromHandle :: MonadIO m => Handle -> Producer Text m ()
+ Pipes.Text.IO: readFile :: MonadSafe m => FilePath -> Producer Text m ()
+ Pipes.Text.IO: stdin :: MonadIO m => Producer Text m ()
+ Pipes.Text.IO: stdout :: MonadIO m => Consumer' Text m ()
+ Pipes.Text.IO: toHandle :: MonadIO m => Handle -> Consumer' Text m r
+ Pipes.Text.IO: writeFile :: MonadSafe m => FilePath -> Consumer' Text m ()
Files
- Pipes/Text.hs +5/−286
- pipes-text.cabal +3/−4
Pipes/Text.hs view
@@ -1,24 +1,11 @@ {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes, TypeFamilies, BangPatterns, Trustworthy #-} -module Pipes.Text (- -- * Effectful Text- -- $intro-- -- * Lenses- -- $lenses-- -- ** @view@ \/ @(^.)@- -- $view-- -- ** @over@ \/ @(%~)@- -- $over-- -- ** @zoom@- -- $zoom-- -- * Special types: @Producer Text m (Producer Text m r)@ and @FreeT (Producer Text m) m r@- -- $special+{-| The module @Pipes.Text@ closely follows @Pipes.ByteString@ from + the @pipes-bytestring@ package. A draft tutorial can be found in+ @Pipes.Text.Tutorial@. +-} +module Pipes.Text ( -- * Producers fromLazy @@ -141,274 +128,6 @@ words, writeFile ) -{- $intro- This package provides @pipes@ utilities for /text streams/ or /character streams/,- realized as streams of 'Text' chunks. The individual chunks are uniformly /strict/,- and thus you will generally want @Data.Text@ in scope. But the type- @Producer Text m r@ ,as we are using it, is a sort of /pipes/ equivalent of the lazy @Text@ type.-- This particular module provides many functions equivalent in one way or another to- the pure functions in- <https://hackage.haskell.org/package/text-1.1.0.0/docs/Data-Text-Lazy.html Data.Text.Lazy>.- They transform, divide, group and fold text streams. Though @Producer Text m r@- is the type of \'effectful Text\', the functions in this module are \'pure\'- in the sense that they are uniformly monad-independent.- Simple /IO/ operations are defined in @Pipes.Text.IO@ -- as lazy IO @Text@- operations are in @Data.Text.Lazy.IO@. Inter-operation with @ByteString@- is provided in @Pipes.Text.Encoding@, which parallels @Data.Text.Lazy.Encoding@.-- The Text type exported by @Data.Text.Lazy@ is basically that of a lazy list of- strict Text: the implementation is arranged so that the individual strict 'Text'- chunks are kept to a reasonable size; the user is not aware of the divisions- between the connected 'Text' chunks.- So also here: the functions in this module are designed to operate on streams that- are insensitive to text boundaries. This means that they may freely split- text into smaller texts and /discard empty texts/. The objective, though, is- that they should /never concatenate texts/ in order to provide strict upper- bounds on memory usage.-- For example, to stream only the first three lines of 'stdin' to 'stdout' you- might write:--> import Pipes-> import qualified Pipes.Text as Text-> import qualified Pipes.Text.IO as Text-> import Pipes.Group (takes')-> import Lens.Family->-> main = runEffect $ takeLines 3 Text.stdin >-> Text.stdout-> where-> takeLines n = Text.unlines . takes' n . view Text.lines-- The above program will never bring more than one chunk of text (~ 32 KB) into- memory, no matter how long the lines are.---}-{- $lenses- As this example shows, one superficial difference from @Data.Text.Lazy@- is that many of the operations, like 'lines', are \'lensified\'; this has a- number of advantages (where it is possible); in particular it facilitates their- use with 'Parser's of Text (in the general <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-parse-3.0.1/docs/Pipes-Parse-Tutorial.html pipes-parse>- sense.) The disadvantage, famously, is that the messages you get for type errors can be- a little alarming. The remarks that follow in this section are for non-lens adepts.-- Each lens exported here, e.g. 'lines', 'chunksOf' or 'splitAt', reduces to the- intuitively corresponding function when used with @view@ or @(^.)@. Instead of- writing:-- > splitAt 17 producer-- as we would with the Prelude or Text functions, we write-- > view (splitAt 17) producer-- or equivalently-- > producer ^. splitAt 17-- This may seem a little indirect, but note that many equivalents of- @Text -> Text@ functions are exported here as 'Pipe's. Here too we recover the intuitively- corresponding functions by prefixing them with @(>->)@. Thus something like--> stripLines = Text.unlines . Group.maps (>-> Text.stripStart) . view Text.lines-- would drop the leading white space from each line.-- The lenses in this library are marked as /improper/; this just means that- they don't admit all the operations of an ideal lens, but only /getting/ and /focusing/.- Just for this reason, though, the magnificent complexities of the lens libraries- are a distraction. The lens combinators to keep in mind, the ones that make sense for- our lenses, are @view@ \/ @(^.)@), @over@ \/ @(%~)@ , and @zoom@.-- One need only keep in mind that if @l@ is a @Lens' a b@, then:---}-{- $view- @view l@ is a function @a -> b@ . Thus @view l a@ (also written @a ^. l@ )- is the corresponding @b@; as was said above, this function will be exactly the- function you think it is, given its name. Thus to uppercase the first n characters- of a Producer, leaving the rest the same, we could write:--- > upper n p = do p' <- p ^. Text.splitAt n >-> Text.toUpper- > p'--}-{- $over- @over l@ is a function @(b -> b) -> a -> a@. Thus, given a function that modifies- @b@s, the lens lets us modify an @a@ by applying @f :: b -> b@ to- the @b@ that we can \"see\" through the lens. So @over l f :: a -> a@- (it can also be written @l %~ f@).- For any particular @a@, then, @over l f a@ or @(l %~ f) a@ is a revised @a@.- So above we might have written things like these:-- > stripLines = Text.lines %~ maps (>-> Text.stripStart)- > stripLines = over Text.lines (maps (>-> Text.stripStart))- > upper n = Text.splitAt n %~ (>-> Text.toUpper)---}-{- $zoom- @zoom l@, finally, is a function from a @Parser b m r@- to a @Parser a m r@ (or more generally a @StateT (Producer b m x) m r@).- Its use is easiest to see with an decoding lens like 'utf8', which- \"sees\" a Text producer hidden inside a ByteString producer:- @drawChar@ is a Text parser, returning a @Maybe Char@, @zoom utf8 drawChar@ is- a /ByteString/ parser, returning a @Maybe Char@. @drawAll@ is a Parser that returns- a list of everything produced from a Producer, leaving only the return value; it would- usually be unreasonable to use it. But @zoom (splitAt 17) drawAll@- returns a list of Text chunks containing the first seventeen Chars, and returns the rest of- the Text Producer for further parsing. Suppose that we want, inexplicably, to- modify the casing of a Text Producer according to any instruction it might- contain at the start. Then we might write something like this:--> obey :: Monad m => Producer Text m b -> Producer Text m b-> obey p = do (ts, p') <- lift $ runStateT (zoom (Text.splitAt 7) drawAll) p-> let seven = T.concat ts-> case T.toUpper seven of-> "TOUPPER" -> p' >-> Text.toUpper-> "TOLOWER" -> p' >-> Text.toLower-> _ -> do yield seven-> p'---> >>> let doc = each ["toU","pperTh","is document.\n"]-> >>> runEffect $ obey doc >-> Text.stdout-> THIS DOCUMENT.-- The purpose of exporting lenses is the mental economy achieved with this three-way- applicability. That one expression, e.g. @lines@ or @splitAt 17@ can have these- three uses is no more surprising than that a pipe can act as a function modifying- the output of a producer, namely by using @>->@ to its left: @producer >-> pipe@- -- but can /also/ modify the inputs to a consumer by using @>->@ to its right:- @pipe >-> consumer@-- The three functions, @view@ \/ @(^.)@, @over@ \/ @(%~)@ and @zoom@ are supplied by- both <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens lens> and- <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens-family lens-family> The use of 'zoom' is explained- in <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-parse-3.0.1/docs/Pipes-Parse-Tutorial.html Pipes.Parse.Tutorial>- and to some extent in the @Pipes.Text.Encoding@ module here.---}-{- $special- These simple 'lines' examples reveal a more important difference from @Data.Text.Lazy@ .- This is in the types that are most closely associated with our central text type,- @Producer Text m r@. In @Data.Text@ and @Data.Text.Lazy@ we find functions like--> splitAt :: Int -> Text -> (Text, Text)-> lines :: Text -> [Text]-> chunksOf :: Int -> Text -> [Text]-- which relate a Text with a pair of Texts or a list of Texts.- The corresponding functions here (taking account of \'lensification\') are--> view . splitAt :: (Monad m, Integral n) => n -> Producer Text m r -> Producer Text m (Producer Text m r)-> view lines :: Monad m => Producer Text m r -> FreeT (Producer Text m) m r-> view . chunksOf :: (Monad m, Integral n) => n -> Producer Text m r -> FreeT (Producer Text m) m r-- Some of the types may be more readable if you imagine that we have introduced- our own type synonyms--> type Text m r = Producer T.Text m r-> type Texts m r = FreeT (Producer T.Text m) m r-- Then we would think of the types above as--> view . splitAt :: (Monad m, Integral n) => n -> Text m r -> Text m (Text m r)-> view lines :: (Monad m) => Text m r -> Texts m r-> view . chunksOf :: (Monad m, Integral n) => n -> Text m r -> Texts m r-- which brings one closer to the types of the similar functions in @Data.Text.Lazy@-- In the type @Producer Text m (Producer Text m r)@ the second- element of the \'pair\' of effectful Texts cannot simply be retrieved- with something like 'snd'. This is an \'effectful\' pair, and one must work- through the effects of the first element to arrive at the second Text stream, even- if you are proposing to throw the Text in the first element away.- Note that we use Control.Monad.join to fuse the pair back together, since it specializes to--> join :: Monad m => Producer Text m (Producer m r) -> Producer m r-- The return type of 'lines', 'words', 'chunksOf' and the other /splitter/ functions,- @FreeT (Producer m Text) m r@ -- our @Texts m r@ -- is the type of (effectful)- lists of (effectful) texts. The type @([Text],r)@ might be seen to gather- together things of the forms:--> r-> (Text,r)-> (Text, (Text, r))-> (Text, (Text, (Text, r)))-> (Text, (Text, (Text, (Text, r))))-> ...-- (We might also have identified the sum of those types with @Free ((,) Text) r@- -- or, more absurdly, @FreeT ((,) Text) Identity r@.)-- Similarly, our type @Texts m r@, or @FreeT (Text m) m r@ -- in fact called- @FreeT (Producer Text m) m r@ here -- encompasses all the members of the sequence:--> m r-> Text m r-> Text m (Text m r)-> Text m (Text m (Text m r))-> Text m (Text m (Text m (Text m r)))-> ...-- We might have used a more specialized type in place of @FreeT (Producer a m) m r@,- or indeed of @FreeT (Producer Text m) m r@, but it is clear that the correct- result type of 'lines' will be isomorphic to @FreeT (Producer Text m) m r@ .-- One might think that--> lines :: Monad m => Lens' (Producer Text m r) (FreeT (Producer Text m) m r)-> view . lines :: Monad m => Producer Text m r -> FreeT (Producer Text m) m r-- should really have the type--> lines :: Monad m => Pipe Text Text m r-- as e.g. 'toUpper' does. But this would spoil the control we are- attempting to maintain over the size of chunks. It is in fact just- as unreasonable to want such a pipe as to want--> Data.Text.Lazy.lines :: Text -> Text-- to 'rechunk' the strict Text chunks inside the lazy Text to respect- line boundaries. In fact we have--> Data.Text.Lazy.lines :: Text -> [Text]-> Prelude.lines :: String -> [String]-- where the elements of the list are themselves lazy Texts or Strings; the use- of @FreeT (Producer Text m) m r@ is simply the 'effectful' version of this.-- The @Pipes.Group@ module, which can generally be imported without qualification,- provides many functions for working with things of type @FreeT (Producer a m) m r@.- In particular it conveniently exports the constructors for @FreeT@ and the associated- @FreeF@ type -- a fancy form of @Either@, namely--> data FreeF f a b = Pure a | Free (f b)-- for pattern-matching. Consider the implementation of the 'words' function, or- of the part of the lens that takes us to the words; it is compact but exhibits many- of the points under discussion, including explicit handling of the @FreeT@ and @FreeF@- constuctors. Keep in mind that--> newtype FreeT f m a = FreeT (m (FreeF f a (FreeT f m a)))-> next :: Monad m => Producer a m r -> m (Either r (a, Producer a m r))-- Thus the @do@ block after the @FreeT@ constructor is in the base monad, e.g. 'IO' or 'Identity';- the later subordinate block, opened by the @Free@ constructor, is in the @Producer@ monad:--> words :: Monad m => Producer Text m r -> FreeT (Producer Text m) m r-> words p = FreeT $ do -- With 'next' we will inspect p's first chunk, excluding spaces;-> x <- next (p >-> dropWhile isSpace) -- note that 'dropWhile isSpace' is a pipe, and is thus *applied* with '>->'.-> return $ case x of -- We use 'return' and so need something of type 'FreeF (Text m) r (Texts m r)'-> Left r -> Pure r -- 'Left' means we got no Text chunk, but only the return value; so we are done.-> Right (txt, p') -> Free $ do -- If we get a chunk and the rest of the producer, p', we enter the 'Producer' monad-> p'' <- view (break isSpace) -- When we apply 'break isSpace', we get a Producer that returns a Producer;-> (yield txt >> p') -- so here we yield everything up to the next space, and get the rest back.-> return (words p'') -- We then carry on with the rest, which is likely to begin with space.---} -- | Convert a lazy 'TL.Text' into a 'Producer' of strict 'Text's fromLazy :: (Monad m) => TL.Text -> Producer' Text m ()
pipes-text.cabal view
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ name: pipes-text-version: 0.0.0.13+version: 0.0.0.14 synopsis: Text pipes. description: * This package will be in a draft, or testing, phase until version 0.0.1. Please report any installation difficulties, or any wisdom about the api, on the github page or the <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/haskell-pipes pipes list> .@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ exposed-modules: Pipes.Text, Pipes.Text.Encoding build-depends: base >= 4 && < 5 , bytestring >= 0.9.2.1 && < 0.11,- text >= 0.11.2 && < 1.2.1 ,+ text >= 0.11.2 && < 1.3 , streaming-commons >= 0.1 && < 0.2 , pipes >= 4.0 && < 4.2 , pipes-group >= 1.0.0 && < 1.1 ,@@ -51,5 +51,4 @@ if !flag(noio) exposed-modules: Pipes.Text.IO- build-depends: text >=0.11.3 && < 1.2-+ build-depends: text >=0.11.3 && < 1.3