ghc-lib-parser 9.6.1.20230312 → 9.6.2.20230523
raw patch · 28 files changed
+596/−320 lines, 28 filesPVP: major bump suggested
API removals or changes: PVP suggests a major version bump
API changes (from Hackage documentation)
+ GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: FromBeta :: OutType -> FromWhat
+ GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: FromLet :: FromWhat
+ GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: [sc_from] :: SimplCont -> FromWhat
+ GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: data FromWhat
+ GHC.Platform: OSGhcjs :: OS
+ GHC.Platform.ArchOS: OSGhcjs :: OS
- GHC.Core.Coercion: setNominalRole_maybe :: Role -> Coercion -> Maybe Coercion
+ GHC.Core.Coercion: setNominalRole_maybe :: Role -> Coercion -> Maybe CoercionN
- GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: StrictBind :: DupFlag -> InId -> InExpr -> StaticEnv -> SimplCont -> SimplCont
+ GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils: StrictBind :: DupFlag -> InId -> FromWhat -> InExpr -> StaticEnv -> SimplCont -> SimplCont
- GHC.Core.Type: applyTysX :: [TyVar] -> Type -> [Type] -> Type
+ GHC.Core.Type: applyTysX :: HasDebugCallStack => [TyVar] -> Type -> [Type] -> Type
Files
- compiler/Bytecodes.h +0/−2
- compiler/GHC/Core.hs +44/−18
- compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs +12/−3
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Arity.hs +9/−2
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/OccurAnal.hs +11/−0
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Env.hs +1/−1
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Iteration.hs +172/−141
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Utils.hs +5/−2
- compiler/GHC/Core/Rules.hs +13/−7
- compiler/GHC/Core/Type.hs +1/−1
- compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs +113/−27
- compiler/GHC/Core/Utils.hs +2/−2
- compiler/GHC/Platform.hs +1/−0
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/TcType.hs +34/−19
- compiler/GHC/Types/Id.hs +8/−6
- compiler/GHC/Types/Id/Make.hs +139/−60
- compiler/ghc.cabal +4/−4
- ghc-lib-parser.cabal +1/−1
- ghc-lib/stage0/libraries/ghc-boot/build/GHC/Version.hs +4/−4
- ghc-lib/stage0/rts/build/include/GhclibDerivedConstants.h +7/−7
- ghc/ghc-bin.cabal +4/−4
- libraries/ghc-boot-th/ghc-boot-th.cabal +1/−1
- libraries/ghc-boot/GHC/Platform/ArchOS.hs +2/−0
- libraries/ghc-boot/ghc-boot.cabal +2/−2
- libraries/ghc-heap/ghc-heap.cabal +1/−1
- libraries/ghci/GHCi/Message.hs +1/−1
- libraries/ghci/ghci.cabal +3/−3
- libraries/template-haskell/template-haskell.cabal +1/−1
compiler/Bytecodes.h view
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ #define bci_PUSH16_W 9 #define bci_PUSH32_W 10 #define bci_PUSH_G 11-#define bci_PUSH_ALTS 12 #define bci_PUSH_ALTS_P 13 #define bci_PUSH_ALTS_N 14 #define bci_PUSH_ALTS_F 15@@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ #define bci_CCALL 56 #define bci_SWIZZLE 57 #define bci_ENTER 58-#define bci_RETURN 59 #define bci_RETURN_P 60 #define bci_RETURN_N 61 #define bci_RETURN_F 62
compiler/GHC/Core.hs view
@@ -1301,16 +1301,19 @@ df_args :: [CoreExpr] -- Args of the data con: types, superclasses and methods, } -- in positional order - | CoreUnfolding { -- An unfolding for an Id with no pragma,- -- or perhaps a NOINLINE pragma- -- (For NOINLINE, the phase, if any, is in the- -- InlinePragInfo for this Id.)- uf_tmpl :: CoreExpr, -- Template; occurrence info is correct- uf_src :: UnfoldingSource, -- Where the unfolding came from- uf_is_top :: Bool, -- True <=> top level binding- uf_cache :: UnfoldingCache, -- Cache of flags computable from the expr- -- See Note [Tying the 'CoreUnfolding' knot]- uf_guidance :: UnfoldingGuidance -- Tells about the *size* of the template.+ | CoreUnfolding { -- An unfolding for an Id with no pragma,+ -- or perhaps a NOINLINE pragma+ -- (For NOINLINE, the phase, if any, is in the+ -- InlinePragInfo for this Id.)+ uf_tmpl :: CoreExpr, -- The unfolding itself (aka "template")+ -- Always occ-analysed;+ -- See Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules]++ uf_src :: UnfoldingSource, -- Where the unfolding came from+ uf_is_top :: Bool, -- True <=> top level binding+ uf_cache :: UnfoldingCache, -- Cache of flags computable from the expr+ -- See Note [Tying the 'CoreUnfolding' knot]+ uf_guidance :: UnfoldingGuidance -- Tells about the *size* of the template. } -- ^ An unfolding with redundant cached information. Parameters: --@@ -1638,14 +1641,37 @@ Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-In unfoldings and rules, we guarantee that the template is occ-analysed,-so that the occurrence info on the binders is correct. This is important,-because the Simplifier does not re-analyse the template when using it. If-the occurrence info is wrong- - We may get more simplifier iterations than necessary, because- once-occ info isn't there- - More seriously, we may get an infinite loop if there's a Rec- without a loop breaker marked+In unfoldings and rules, we guarantee that the template is occ-analysed, so+that the occurrence info on the binders is correct. That way, when the+Simplifier inlines an unfolding, it doesn't need to occ-analysis it first.+(The Simplifier is designed to simplify occ-analysed expressions.)++Given this decision it's vital that we do *always* do it.++* If we don't, we may get more simplifier iterations than necessary,+ because once-occ info isn't there++* More seriously, we may get an infinite loop if there's a Rec without a+ loop breaker marked.++* Or we may get code that mentions variables not in scope: #22761+ e.g. Suppose we have a stable unfolding : \y. let z = p+1 in 3+ Then the pre-simplifier occ-anal will occ-anal the unfolding+ (redundantly perhaps, but we need its free vars); this will not report+ the use of `p`; so p's binding will be discarded, and yet `p` is still+ mentioned.++ Better to occ-anal the unfolding at birth, which will drop the+ z-binding as dead code. (Remember, it's the occurrence analyser that+ drops dead code.)++* Another example is #8892:+ \x -> letrec { f = ...g...; g* = f } in body+ where g* is (for some strange reason) the loop breaker. If we don't+ occ-anal it when reading it in, we won't mark g as a loop breaker, and we+ may inline g entirely in body, dropping its binding, and leaving the+ occurrence in f out of scope. This happened in #8892, where the unfolding+ in question was a DFun unfolding. ************************************************************************
compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs view
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ -- | Converts a coercion to be nominal, if possible. -- See Note [Role twiddling functions] setNominalRole_maybe :: Role -- of input coercion- -> Coercion -> Maybe Coercion+ -> Coercion -> Maybe CoercionN setNominalRole_maybe r co | r == Nominal = Just co | otherwise = setNominalRole_maybe_helper co@@ -1380,10 +1380,19 @@ = AppCo <$> setNominalRole_maybe_helper co1 <*> pure co2 setNominalRole_maybe_helper (ForAllCo tv kind_co co) = ForAllCo tv kind_co <$> setNominalRole_maybe_helper co- setNominalRole_maybe_helper (SelCo n co)+ setNominalRole_maybe_helper (SelCo cs co) = -- NB, this case recurses via setNominalRole_maybe, not -- setNominalRole_maybe_helper!- = SelCo n <$> setNominalRole_maybe (coercionRole co) co+ case cs of+ SelTyCon n _r ->+ -- Remember to update the role in SelTyCon to nominal;+ -- not doing this caused #23362.+ -- See the typing rule in Note [SelCo] in GHC.Core.TyCo.Rep.+ SelCo (SelTyCon n Nominal) <$> setNominalRole_maybe (coercionRole co) co+ SelFun fs ->+ SelCo (SelFun fs) <$> setNominalRole_maybe (coercionRole co) co+ SelForAll ->+ pprPanic "setNominalRole_maybe: the coercion should already be nominal" (ppr co) setNominalRole_maybe_helper (InstCo co arg) = InstCo <$> setNominalRole_maybe_helper co <*> pure arg setNominalRole_maybe_helper (UnivCo prov _ co1 co2)
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Arity.hs view
@@ -3085,8 +3085,15 @@ | need_args < 0 = pprPanic "etaExpandToJoinPointRule" (ppr join_arity $$ ppr rule) | otherwise- = rule { ru_bndrs = bndrs ++ new_bndrs, ru_args = args ++ new_args- , ru_rhs = new_rhs }+ = rule { ru_bndrs = bndrs ++ new_bndrs+ , ru_args = args ++ new_args+ , ru_rhs = new_rhs }+ -- new_rhs really ought to be occ-analysed (see GHC.Core Note+ -- [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules]), but it makes a module loop to+ -- do so; it doesn't happen often; and it doesn't really matter if+ -- the outer binders have bogus occurrence info; and new_rhs won't+ -- have dead code if rhs didn't.+ where need_args = join_arity - length args (new_bndrs, new_rhs) = etaBodyForJoinPoint need_args rhs
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/OccurAnal.hs view
@@ -2046,6 +2046,17 @@ empty. This just saves a bit of allocation and reconstruction; not a big deal. +This fast path exposes a tricky cornder, though (#22761). Supose we have+ Unfolding = \x. let y = foo in x+1+which includes a dead binding for `y`. In occAnalUnfolding we occ-anal+the unfolding and produce /no/ occurrences of `foo` (since `y` is+dead). But if we discard the occ-analysed syntax tree (which we do on+our fast path), and use the old one, we still /have/ an occurrence of+`foo` -- and that can lead to out-of-scope variables (#22761).++Solution: always keep occ-analysed trees in unfoldings and rules, so they+have no dead code. See Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules] in GHC.Core.+ Note [Cascading inlines] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ By default we use an rhsCtxt for the RHS of a binding. This tells the
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Env.hs view
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ -- See Note [Bangs in the Simplifier] !id1 = uniqAway in_scope old_id !id2 = substIdType env id1- !id3 = zapFragileIdInfo id2 -- Zaps rules, worker-info, unfolding+ !id3 = zapFragileIdInfo id2 -- Zaps rules, worker-info, unfolding -- and fragile OccInfo !new_id = adjust_type id3
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Iteration.hs view
@@ -318,14 +318,14 @@ -> TopLevelFlag -> RecFlag -> InId -> OutId -- Binder, both pre-and post simpl -- Not a JoinId- -- The OutId has IdInfo, except arity, unfolding+ -- The OutId has IdInfo (notably RULES),+ -- except arity, unfolding -- Ids only, no TyVars -> InExpr -> SimplEnv -- The RHS and its environment -> SimplM (SimplFloats, SimplEnv) -- Precondition: the OutId is already in the InScopeSet of the incoming 'env' -- Precondition: not a JoinId -- Precondition: rhs obeys the let-can-float invariant--- NOT used for JoinIds simplLazyBind env top_lvl is_rec bndr bndr1 rhs rhs_se = assert (isId bndr ) assertPpr (not (isJoinId bndr)) (ppr bndr) $@@ -397,48 +397,45 @@ ; completeBind env (BC_Join is_rec cont) old_bndr new_bndr rhs' } ---------------------------simplNonRecX :: SimplEnv+simplAuxBind :: SimplEnv -> InId -- Old binder; not a JoinId -> OutExpr -- Simplified RHS -> SimplM (SimplFloats, SimplEnv)--- A specialised variant of simplNonRec used when the RHS is already--- simplified, notably in knownCon. It uses case-binding where necessary.+-- A specialised variant of completeBindX used to construct non-recursive+-- auxiliary bindings, notably in knownCon. --+-- The binder comes from a case expression (case binder or alternative)+-- and so does not have rules, inline pragmas etc.+-- -- Precondition: rhs satisfies the let-can-float invariant -simplNonRecX env bndr new_rhs- | assertPpr (not (isJoinId bndr)) (ppr bndr) $+simplAuxBind env bndr new_rhs+ | assertPpr (isId bndr && not (isJoinId bndr)) (ppr bndr) $ isDeadBinder bndr -- Not uncommon; e.g. case (a,b) of c { (p,q) -> p } = return (emptyFloats env, env) -- Here c is dead, and we avoid- -- creating the binding c = (a,b)-- | Coercion co <- new_rhs- = return (emptyFloats env, extendCvSubst env bndr co)+ -- creating the binding c = (a,b) + -- The cases would be inlined unconditionally by completeBind:+ -- but it seems not uncommon, and avoids faff to do it here+ -- This is safe because it's only used for auxiliary bindings, which+ -- have no NOLINE pragmas, nor RULEs | exprIsTrivial new_rhs -- Short-cut for let x = y in ...- -- This case would ultimately land in postInlineUnconditionally- -- but it seems not uncommon, and avoids a lot of faff to do it here- = return (emptyFloats env- , extendIdSubst env bndr (DoneEx new_rhs Nothing))+ = return ( emptyFloats env+ , case new_rhs of+ Coercion co -> extendCvSubst env bndr co+ _ -> extendIdSubst env bndr (DoneEx new_rhs Nothing) ) | otherwise- = do { (env1, new_bndr) <- simplBinder env bndr- ; let is_strict = isStrictId new_bndr- -- isStrictId: use new_bndr because the InId bndr might not have- -- a fixed runtime representation, which isStrictId doesn't expect- -- c.f. Note [Dark corner with representation polymorphism]-- ; (rhs_floats, rhs1) <- prepareBinding env NotTopLevel NonRecursive is_strict- new_bndr (emptyFloats env) new_rhs- -- NB: it makes a surprisingly big difference (5% in compiler allocation- -- in T9630) to pass 'env' rather than 'env1'. It's fine to pass 'env',- -- because this is simplNonRecX, so bndr is not in scope in the RHS.+ = do { -- ANF-ise the RHS+ let !occ_fs = getOccFS bndr+ ; (anf_floats, rhs1) <- prepareRhs env NotTopLevel occ_fs new_rhs+ ; unless (isEmptyLetFloats anf_floats) (tick LetFloatFromLet)+ ; let rhs_floats = emptyFloats env `addLetFloats` anf_floats - ; (bind_float, env2) <- completeBind (env1 `setInScopeFromF` rhs_floats)- (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive)+ -- Simplify the binder and complete the binding+ ; (env1, new_bndr) <- simplBinder (env `setInScopeFromF` rhs_floats) bndr+ ; (bind_float, env2) <- completeBind env1 (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive) bndr new_bndr rhs1- -- Must pass env1 to completeBind in case simplBinder had to clone,- -- and extended the substitution with [bndr :-> new_bndr] ; return (rhs_floats `addFloats` bind_float, env2) } @@ -760,49 +757,54 @@ -- x = Just a -- See Note [prepareRhs] prepareRhs env top_lvl occ rhs0- = do { (_is_exp, floats, rhs1) <- go 0 rhs0- ; return (floats, rhs1) }+ | is_expandable = anfise rhs0+ | otherwise = return (emptyLetFloats, rhs0) where- go :: Int -> OutExpr -> SimplM (Bool, LetFloats, OutExpr)- go n_val_args (Cast rhs co)- = do { (is_exp, floats, rhs') <- go n_val_args rhs- ; return (is_exp, floats, Cast rhs' co) }- go n_val_args (App fun (Type ty))- = do { (is_exp, floats, rhs') <- go n_val_args fun- ; return (is_exp, floats, App rhs' (Type ty)) }- go n_val_args (App fun arg)- = do { (is_exp, floats1, fun') <- go (n_val_args+1) fun- ; if is_exp- then do { (floats2, arg') <- makeTrivial env top_lvl topDmd occ arg- ; return (True, floats1 `addLetFlts` floats2, App fun' arg') }- else return (False, emptyLetFloats, App fun arg)- }- go n_val_args (Var fun)- = return (is_exp, emptyLetFloats, Var fun)- where- is_exp = isExpandableApp fun n_val_args -- The fun a constructor or PAP- -- See Note [CONLIKE pragma] in GHC.Types.Basic- -- The definition of is_exp should match that in- -- 'GHC.Core.Opt.OccurAnal.occAnalApp'+ -- We can' use exprIsExpandable because the WHOLE POINT is that+ -- we want to treat (K <big>) as expandable, because we are just+ -- about "anfise" the <big> expression. exprIsExpandable would+ -- just say no!+ is_expandable = go rhs0 0+ where+ go (Var fun) n_val_args = isExpandableApp fun n_val_args+ go (App fun arg) n_val_args+ | isTypeArg arg = go fun n_val_args+ | otherwise = go fun (n_val_args + 1)+ go (Cast rhs _) n_val_args = go rhs n_val_args+ go (Tick _ rhs) n_val_args = go rhs n_val_args+ go _ _ = False - go n_val_args (Tick t rhs)+ anfise :: OutExpr -> SimplM (LetFloats, OutExpr)+ anfise (Cast rhs co)+ = do { (floats, rhs') <- anfise rhs+ ; return (floats, Cast rhs' co) }+ anfise (App fun (Type ty))+ = do { (floats, rhs') <- anfise fun+ ; return (floats, App rhs' (Type ty)) }+ anfise (App fun arg)+ = do { (floats1, fun') <- anfise fun+ ; (floats2, arg') <- makeTrivial env top_lvl topDmd occ arg+ ; return (floats1 `addLetFlts` floats2, App fun' arg') }+ anfise (Var fun)+ = return (emptyLetFloats, Var fun)++ anfise (Tick t rhs) -- We want to be able to float bindings past this -- tick. Non-scoping ticks don't care. | tickishScoped t == NoScope- = do { (is_exp, floats, rhs') <- go n_val_args rhs- ; return (is_exp, floats, Tick t rhs') }+ = do { (floats, rhs') <- anfise rhs+ ; return (floats, Tick t rhs') } -- On the other hand, for scoping ticks we need to be able to -- copy them on the floats, which in turn is only allowed if -- we can obtain non-counting ticks. | (not (tickishCounts t) || tickishCanSplit t)- = do { (is_exp, floats, rhs') <- go n_val_args rhs+ = do { (floats, rhs') <- anfise rhs ; let tickIt (id, expr) = (id, mkTick (mkNoCount t) expr) floats' = mapLetFloats floats tickIt- ; return (is_exp, floats', Tick t rhs') }+ ; return (floats', Tick t rhs') } - go _ other- = return (False, emptyLetFloats, other)+ anfise other = return (emptyLetFloats, other) makeTrivialArg :: HasDebugCallStack => SimplEnv -> ArgSpec -> SimplM (LetFloats, ArgSpec) makeTrivialArg env arg@(ValArg { as_arg = e, as_dmd = dmd })@@ -1243,7 +1245,7 @@ | otherwise = {-#SCC "simplNonRecE" #-}- simplNonRecE env False bndr (rhs, env) body cont+ simplNonRecE env FromLet bndr (rhs, env) body cont {- Note [Avoiding space leaks in OutType] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@@ -1504,8 +1506,9 @@ StrictArg { sc_fun = fun, sc_cont = cont, sc_fun_ty = fun_ty } -> rebuildCall env (addValArgTo fun expr fun_ty ) cont - StrictBind { sc_bndr = b, sc_body = body, sc_env = se, sc_cont = cont }- -> completeBindX (se `setInScopeFromE` env) b expr body cont+ StrictBind { sc_bndr = b, sc_body = body, sc_env = se+ , sc_cont = cont, sc_from = from_what }+ -> completeBindX (se `setInScopeFromE` env) from_what b expr body cont ApplyToTy { sc_arg_ty = ty, sc_cont = cont} -> rebuild env (App expr (Type ty)) cont@@ -1517,26 +1520,49 @@ ; rebuild env (App expr arg') cont } completeBindX :: SimplEnv+ -> FromWhat -> InId -> OutExpr -- Bind this Id to this (simplified) expression -- (the let-can-float invariant may not be satisfied)- -> InExpr -- In this lambda+ -> InExpr -- In this body -> SimplCont -- Consumed by this continuation -> SimplM (SimplFloats, OutExpr)-completeBindX env bndr rhs body cont- | needsCaseBinding (idType bndr) rhs -- Enforcing the let-can-float-invariant- = do { (env1, bndr1) <- simplNonRecBndr env bndr- ; (floats, expr') <- simplLam env1 body cont+completeBindX env from_what bndr rhs body cont+ | FromBeta arg_ty <- from_what+ , needsCaseBinding arg_ty rhs -- Enforcing the let-can-float-invariant+ = do { (env1, bndr1) <- simplNonRecBndr env bndr -- Lambda binders don't have rules+ ; (floats, expr') <- simplNonRecBody env1 from_what body cont -- Do not float floats past the Case binder below ; let expr'' = wrapFloats floats expr'- ; let case_expr = Case rhs bndr1 (contResultType cont) [Alt DEFAULT [] expr'']+ case_expr = Case rhs bndr1 (contResultType cont) [Alt DEFAULT [] expr''] ; return (emptyFloats env, case_expr) } - | otherwise- = do { (floats1, env') <- simplNonRecX env bndr rhs- ; (floats2, expr') <- simplLam env' body cont- ; return (floats1 `addFloats` floats2, expr') }+ | otherwise -- Make a let-binding+ = do { (env1, bndr1) <- simplNonRecBndr env bndr+ ; (env2, bndr2) <- addBndrRules env1 bndr bndr1 (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive) + ; let is_strict = isStrictId bndr2+ -- isStrictId: use simplified binder because the InId bndr might not have+ -- a fixed runtime representation, which isStrictId doesn't expect+ -- c.f. Note [Dark corner with representation polymorphism] + ; (rhs_floats, rhs1) <- prepareBinding env NotTopLevel NonRecursive is_strict+ bndr2 (emptyFloats env) rhs+ -- NB: it makes a surprisingly big difference (5% in compiler allocation+ -- in T9630) to pass 'env' rather than 'env1'. It's fine to pass 'env',+ -- because this is simplNonRecX, so bndr is not in scope in the RHS.++ ; (bind_float, env2) <- completeBind (env2 `setInScopeFromF` rhs_floats)+ (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive)+ bndr bndr2 rhs1+ -- Must pass env1 to completeBind in case simplBinder had to clone,+ -- and extended the substitution with [bndr :-> new_bndr]++ -- Simplify the body+ ; (body_floats, body') <- simplNonRecBody env2 from_what body cont++ ; let all_floats = rhs_floats `addFloats` bind_float `addFloats` body_floats+ ; return ( all_floats, body' ) }+ {- ************************************************************************ * *@@ -1673,6 +1699,14 @@ ************************************************************************ -} +simplNonRecBody :: SimplEnv -> FromWhat+ -> InExpr -> SimplCont+ -> SimplM (SimplFloats, OutExpr)+simplNonRecBody env from_what body cont+ = case from_what of+ FromLet -> simplExprF env body cont+ FromBeta {} -> simplLam env body cont+ simplLam :: SimplEnv -> InExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM (SimplFloats, OutExpr) @@ -1689,16 +1723,25 @@ -- Value beta-reduction simpl_lam env bndr body (ApplyToVal { sc_arg = arg, sc_env = arg_se- , sc_cont = cont, sc_dup = dup })- | isSimplified dup -- Don't re-simplify if we've simplified it once- -- See Note [Avoiding exponential behaviour]+ , sc_cont = cont, sc_dup = dup+ , sc_hole_ty = fun_ty}) = do { tick (BetaReduction bndr)- ; completeBindX env bndr arg body cont }+ ; let arg_ty = funArgTy fun_ty+ ; if | isSimplified dup -- Don't re-simplify if we've simplified it once+ -- Including don't preInlineUnconditionally+ -- See Note [Avoiding exponential behaviour]+ -> completeBindX env (FromBeta arg_ty) bndr arg body cont - | otherwise -- See Note [Avoiding exponential behaviour]- = do { tick (BetaReduction bndr)- ; simplNonRecE env True bndr (arg, arg_se) body cont }+ | Just env' <- preInlineUnconditionally env NotTopLevel bndr arg arg_se+ , not (needsCaseBinding arg_ty arg)+ -- Ok to test arg::InExpr in needsCaseBinding because+ -- exprOkForSpeculation is stable under simplification+ -> do { tick (PreInlineUnconditionally bndr)+ ; simplLam env' body cont } + | otherwise+ -> simplNonRecE env (FromBeta arg_ty) bndr (arg, arg_se) body cont }+ -- Discard a non-counting tick on a lambda. This may change the -- cost attribution slightly (moving the allocation of the -- lambda elsewhere), but we don't care: optimisation changes@@ -1729,8 +1772,7 @@ ------------------ simplNonRecE :: SimplEnv- -> Bool -- True <=> from a lambda- -- False <=> from a let+ -> FromWhat -> InId -- The binder, always an Id -- Never a join point -> (InExpr, SimplEnv) -- Rhs of binding (or arg of lambda)@@ -1739,57 +1781,49 @@ -> SimplM (SimplFloats, OutExpr) -- simplNonRecE is used for--- * non-top-level non-recursive non-join-point lets in expressions--- * beta reduction+-- * from=FromLet: a non-top-level non-recursive non-join-point let-expression+-- * from=FromBeta: a binding arising from a beta reduction ----- simplNonRec env b (rhs, rhs_se) body k+-- simplNonRecE env b (rhs, rhs_se) body k -- = let env in -- cont< let b = rhs_se(rhs) in body > -- -- It deals with strict bindings, via the StrictBind continuation, -- which may abort the whole process. ----- from_lam=False => the RHS satisfies the let-can-float invariant+-- from_what=FromLet => the RHS satisfies the let-can-float invariant -- Otherwise it may or may not satisfy it. -simplNonRecE env from_lam bndr (rhs, rhs_se) body cont- = assert (isId bndr && not (isJoinId bndr) ) $- do { (env1, bndr1) <- simplNonRecBndr env bndr- ; let needs_case_binding = needsCaseBinding (idType bndr1) rhs- -- See Note [Dark corner with representation polymorphism]- -- If from_lam=False then needs_case_binding is False,- -- because the binding started as a let, which must- -- satisfy let-can-float+simplNonRecE env from_what bndr (rhs, rhs_se) body cont+ | assert (isId bndr && not (isJoinId bndr) ) $+ is_strict_bind+ = -- Evaluate RHS strictly+ simplExprF (rhs_se `setInScopeFromE` env) rhs+ (StrictBind { sc_bndr = bndr, sc_body = body, sc_from = from_what+ , sc_env = env, sc_cont = cont, sc_dup = NoDup }) - ; if | from_lam && not needs_case_binding- -- If not from_lam we are coming from a (NonRec bndr rhs) binding- -- and preInlineUnconditionally has been done already;- -- no need to repeat it. But for lambdas we must be careful about- -- preInlineUndonditionally: consider (\(x:Int#). 3) (error "urk")- -- We must not drop the (error "urk").- , Just env' <- preInlineUnconditionally env NotTopLevel bndr rhs rhs_se- -> do { tick (PreInlineUnconditionally bndr)- ; -- pprTrace "preInlineUncond" (ppr bndr <+> ppr rhs) $- simplLam env' body cont }+ | otherwise -- Evaluate RHS lazily+ = do { (env1, bndr1) <- simplNonRecBndr env bndr+ ; (env2, bndr2) <- addBndrRules env1 bndr bndr1 (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive)+ ; (floats1, env3) <- simplLazyBind env2 NotTopLevel NonRecursive+ bndr bndr2 rhs rhs_se+ ; (floats2, expr') <- simplNonRecBody env3 from_what body cont+ ; return (floats1 `addFloats` floats2, expr') } - -- Deal with strict bindings- | isStrictId bndr1 && seCaseCase env- || from_lam && needs_case_binding- -- The important bit here is needs_case_binds; but no need to- -- test it if from_lam is False because then needs_case_binding is False too- -- NB: either way, the RHS may or may not satisfy let-can-float- -- but that's ok for StrictBind.- -> simplExprF (rhs_se `setInScopeFromE` env) rhs- (StrictBind { sc_bndr = bndr, sc_body = body- , sc_env = env, sc_cont = cont, sc_dup = NoDup })+ where+ is_strict_bind = case from_what of+ FromBeta arg_ty | isUnliftedType arg_ty -> True+ -- If we are coming from a beta-reduction (FromBeta) we must+ -- establish the let-can-float invariant, so go via StrictBind+ -- If not, the invariant holds already, and it's optional.+ -- Using arg_ty: see Note [Dark corner with representation polymorphism]+ -- e.g (\r \(a::TYPE r) \(x::a). blah) @LiftedRep @Int arg+ -- When we come to `x=arg` we myst choose lazy/strict correctly+ -- It's wrong to err in either directly - -- Deal with lazy bindings- | otherwise- -> do { (env2, bndr2) <- addBndrRules env1 bndr bndr1 (BC_Let NotTopLevel NonRecursive)- ; (floats1, env3) <- simplLazyBind env2 NotTopLevel NonRecursive bndr bndr2 rhs rhs_se- ; (floats2, expr') <- simplLam env3 body cont- ; return (floats1 `addFloats` floats2, expr') } }+ _ -> seCaseCase env && isStrUsedDmd (idDemandInfo bndr) + ------------------ simplRecE :: SimplEnv -> [(InId, InExpr)]@@ -1834,7 +1868,7 @@ One way in which we can get exponential behaviour is if we simplify a big expression, and then re-simplify it -- and then this happens in a deeply-nested way. So we must be jolly careful about re-simplifying-an expression. That is why simplNonRecX does not try+an expression (#13379). That is why simplNonRecX does not try preInlineUnconditionally (unlike simplNonRecE). Example:@@ -2617,15 +2651,10 @@ of the rule firing to simplify it, so occurrence analysis is at most a constant factor. -Possible improvement: occ-anal the rules when putting them in the-database; and in the simplifier just occ-anal the OutExpr arguments.-But that's more complicated and the rule RHS is usually tiny; so I'm-just doing the simple thing.--Historical note: previously we did occ-anal the rules in Rule.hs,-but failed to occ-anal the OutExpr arguments, which led to the-nasty performance problem described above.-+Note, however, that the rule RHS is /already/ occ-analysed; see+Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules] in GHC.Core. There is something+unsatisfactory about doing it twice; but the rule RHS is usually very+small, and this is simple. Note [Optimising tagToEnum#] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@@ -2929,7 +2958,7 @@ where simple_rhs env wfloats case_bndr_rhs bs rhs = assert (null bs) $- do { (floats1, env') <- simplNonRecX env case_bndr case_bndr_rhs+ do { (floats1, env') <- simplAuxBind env case_bndr case_bndr_rhs -- scrut is a constructor application, -- hence satisfies let-can-float invariant ; (floats2, expr') <- simplExprF env' rhs cont@@ -2996,7 +3025,7 @@ | all_dead_bndrs , doCaseToLet scrut case_bndr = do { tick (CaseElim case_bndr)- ; (floats1, env') <- simplNonRecX env case_bndr scrut+ ; (floats1, env') <- simplAuxBind env case_bndr scrut ; (floats2, expr') <- simplExprF env' rhs cont ; return (floats1 `addFloats` floats2, expr') } @@ -3484,12 +3513,11 @@ bind_args env' (b:bs') (arg : args) = assert (isId b) $ do { let b' = zap_occ b- -- Note that the binder might be "dead", because it doesn't- -- occur in the RHS; and simplNonRecX may therefore discard- -- it via postInlineUnconditionally.+ -- zap_occ: the binder might be "dead", because it doesn't+ -- occur in the RHS; and simplAuxBind may therefore discard it. -- Nevertheless we must keep it if the case-binder is alive, -- because it may be used in the con_app. See Note [knownCon occ info]- ; (floats1, env2) <- simplNonRecX env' b' arg -- arg satisfies let-can-float invariant+ ; (floats1, env2) <- simplAuxBind env' b' arg -- arg satisfies let-can-float invariant ; (floats2, env3) <- bind_args env2 bs' args ; return (floats1 `addFloats` floats2, env3) } @@ -3515,7 +3543,7 @@ ; let con_app = Var (dataConWorkId dc) `mkTyApps` dc_ty_args `mkApps` dc_args- ; simplNonRecX env bndr con_app }+ ; simplAuxBind env bndr con_app } ------------------- missingAlt :: SimplEnv -> Id -> [InAlt] -> SimplCont@@ -3622,15 +3650,15 @@ ; return (floats, TickIt t cont') } mkDupableContWithDmds env _- (StrictBind { sc_bndr = bndr, sc_body = body+ (StrictBind { sc_bndr = bndr, sc_body = body, sc_from = from_what , sc_env = se, sc_cont = cont}) -- See Note [Duplicating StrictBind] -- K[ let x = <> in b ] --> join j x = K[ b ] -- j <> = do { let sb_env = se `setInScopeFromE` env ; (sb_env1, bndr') <- simplBinder sb_env bndr- ; (floats1, join_inner) <- simplLam sb_env1 body cont- -- No need to use mkDupableCont before simplLam; we+ ; (floats1, join_inner) <- simplNonRecBody sb_env1 from_what body cont+ -- No need to use mkDupableCont before simplNonRecBody; we -- use cont once here, and then share the result if necessary ; let join_body = wrapFloats floats1 join_inner@@ -3758,6 +3786,7 @@ , StrictBind { sc_bndr = arg_bndr , sc_body = join_rhs , sc_env = zapSubstEnv env+ , sc_from = FromLet -- See Note [StaticEnv invariant] in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils , sc_dup = OkToDup , sc_cont = mkBoringStop res_ty } )@@ -4431,7 +4460,9 @@ ; return (rule { ru_bndrs = bndrs' , ru_fn = fn_name' , ru_args = args'- , ru_rhs = rhs' }) }+ , ru_rhs = occurAnalyseExpr rhs' }) }+ -- Remember to occ-analyse, to drop dead code.+ -- See Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules] in GHC.Core {- Note [Simplifying the RHS of a RULE] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Simplify/Utils.hs view
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BindContext(..), bindContextLevel, -- The continuation type- SimplCont(..), DupFlag(..), StaticEnv,+ SimplCont(..), DupFlag(..), FromWhat(..), StaticEnv, isSimplified, contIsStop, contIsDupable, contResultType, contHoleType, contHoleScaling, contIsTrivial, contArgs, contIsRhs,@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ -- or, equivalently, = K[ (\x.b) e ] { sc_dup :: DupFlag -- See Note [DupFlag invariants] , sc_bndr :: InId+ , sc_from :: FromWhat , sc_body :: InExpr , sc_env :: StaticEnv -- See Note [StaticEnv invariant] , sc_cont :: SimplCont }@@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ type StaticEnv = SimplEnv -- Just the static part is relevant +data FromWhat = FromLet | FromBeta OutType+ -- See Note [DupFlag invariants] data DupFlag = NoDup -- Unsimplified, might be big | Simplified -- Simplified@@ -549,7 +552,7 @@ countValArgs :: SimplCont -> Int -- Count value arguments only-countValArgs (ApplyToTy { sc_cont = cont }) = 1 + countValArgs cont+countValArgs (ApplyToTy { sc_cont = cont }) = countValArgs cont countValArgs (ApplyToVal { sc_cont = cont }) = 1 + countValArgs cont countValArgs (CastIt _ cont) = countValArgs cont countValArgs _ = 0
compiler/GHC/Core/Rules.hs view
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ import GHC.Core.Tidy ( tidyRules ) import GHC.Core.Map.Expr ( eqCoreExpr ) import GHC.Core.Opt.Arity( etaExpandToJoinPointRule )+import GHC.Core.Opt.OccurAnal ( occurAnalyseExpr ) import GHC.Tc.Utils.TcType ( tcSplitTyConApp_maybe ) import GHC.Builtin.Types ( anyTypeOfKind )@@ -187,13 +188,18 @@ -- ^ Used to make 'CoreRule' for an 'Id' defined in the module being -- compiled. See also 'GHC.Core.CoreRule' mkRule this_mod is_auto is_local name act fn bndrs args rhs- = Rule { ru_name = name, ru_fn = fn, ru_act = act,- ru_bndrs = bndrs, ru_args = args,- ru_rhs = rhs,- ru_rough = roughTopNames args,- ru_origin = this_mod,- ru_orphan = orph,- ru_auto = is_auto, ru_local = is_local }+ = Rule { ru_name = name+ , ru_act = act+ , ru_fn = fn+ , ru_bndrs = bndrs+ , ru_args = args+ , ru_rhs = occurAnalyseExpr rhs+ -- See Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules]+ , ru_rough = roughTopNames args+ , ru_origin = this_mod+ , ru_orphan = orph+ , ru_auto = is_auto+ , ru_local = is_local } where -- Compute orphanhood. See Note [Orphans] in GHC.Core.InstEnv -- A rule is an orphan only if none of the variables
compiler/GHC/Core/Type.hs view
@@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ -- c.f. #15473 pprPanic "piResultTys2" (ppr ty $$ ppr orig_args $$ ppr all_args) -applyTysX :: [TyVar] -> Type -> [Type] -> Type+applyTysX :: HasDebugCallStack => [TyVar] -> Type -> [Type] -> Type -- applyTysX beta-reduces (/\tvs. body_ty) arg_tys -- Assumes that (/\tvs. body_ty) is closed applyTysX tvs body_ty arg_tys
compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs view
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -- (c) The University of Glasgow 2006 -{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables, PatternSynonyms #-}+{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables, PatternSynonyms, MultiWayIf #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-} @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ import GHC.Types.Unique.FM import GHC.Types.Unique.Set import GHC.Exts( oneShot )+import GHC.Utils.Panic import GHC.Utils.Panic.Plain import GHC.Data.FastString @@ -994,6 +995,59 @@ (legitimately) have different numbers of arguments. They are surelyApart, so we can report that without looking any further (see #15704).++Note [Unifying type applications]+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+Unifying type applications is quite subtle, as we found+in #23134 and #22647, when type families are involved.++Suppose+ type family F a :: Type -> Type+ type family G k :: k = r | r -> k++and consider these examples:++* F Int ~ F Char, where F is injective+ Since F is injective, we can reduce this to Int ~ Char,+ therefore SurelyApart.++* F Int ~ F Char, where F is not injective+ Without injectivity, return MaybeApart.++* G Type ~ G (Type -> Type) Int+ Even though G is injective and the arguments to G are different,+ we cannot deduce apartness because the RHS is oversaturated.+ For example, G might be defined as+ G Type = Maybe Int+ G (Type -> Type) = Maybe+ So we return MaybeApart.++* F Int Bool ~ F Int Char -- SurelyApart (since Bool is apart from Char)+ F Int Bool ~ Maybe a -- MaybeApart+ F Int Bool ~ a b -- MaybeApart+ F Int Bool ~ Char -> Bool -- MaybeApart+ An oversaturated type family can match an application,+ whether it's a TyConApp, AppTy or FunTy. Decompose.++* F Int ~ a b+ We cannot decompose a saturated, or under-saturated+ type family application. We return MaybeApart.++To handle all those conditions, unify_ty goes through+the following checks in sequence, where Fn is a type family+of arity n:++* (C1) Fn x_1 ... x_n ~ Fn y_1 .. y_n+ A saturated application.+ Here we can unify arguments in which Fn is injective.+* (C2) Fn x_1 ... x_n ~ anything, anything ~ Fn x_1 ... x_n+ A saturated type family can match anything - we return MaybeApart.+* (C3) Fn x_1 ... x_m ~ a b, a b ~ Fn x_1 ... x_m where m > n+ An oversaturated type family can be decomposed.+* (C4) Fn x_1 ... x_m ~ anything, anything ~ Fn x_1 ... x_m, where m > n+ If we couldn't decompose in the previous step, we return SurelyApart.++Afterwards, the rest of the code doesn't have to worry about type families. -} -------------- unify_ty: the main workhorse -----------@@ -1035,32 +1089,64 @@ = uVar (umSwapRn env) tv2 ty1 (mkSymCo kco) unify_ty env ty1 ty2 _kco- | Just (tc1, tys1) <- mb_tc_app1- , Just (tc2, tys2) <- mb_tc_app2++ -- Handle non-oversaturated type families first+ -- See Note [Unifying type applications]+ --+ -- (C1) If we have T x1 ... xn ~ T y1 ... yn, use injectivity information of T+ -- Note that both sides must not be oversaturated+ | Just (tc1, tys1) <- isSatTyFamApp mb_tc_app1+ , Just (tc2, tys2) <- isSatTyFamApp mb_tc_app2 , tc1 == tc2- = if isInjectiveTyCon tc1 Nominal- then unify_tys env tys1 tys2- else do { let inj | isTypeFamilyTyCon tc1- = case tyConInjectivityInfo tc1 of- NotInjective -> repeat False- Injective bs -> bs- | otherwise- = repeat False+ = do { let inj = case tyConInjectivityInfo tc1 of+ NotInjective -> repeat False+ Injective bs -> bs - (inj_tys1, noninj_tys1) = partitionByList inj tys1- (inj_tys2, noninj_tys2) = partitionByList inj tys2+ (inj_tys1, noninj_tys1) = partitionByList inj tys1+ (inj_tys2, noninj_tys2) = partitionByList inj tys2 - ; unify_tys env inj_tys1 inj_tys2- ; unless (um_inj_tf env) $ -- See (end of) Note [Specification of unification]- don'tBeSoSure MARTypeFamily $ unify_tys env noninj_tys1 noninj_tys2 }+ ; unify_tys env inj_tys1 inj_tys2+ ; unless (um_inj_tf env) $ -- See (end of) Note [Specification of unification]+ don'tBeSoSure MARTypeFamily $ unify_tys env noninj_tys1 noninj_tys2 } - | isTyFamApp mb_tc_app1 -- A (not-over-saturated) type-family application- = maybeApart MARTypeFamily -- behaves like a type variable; might match+ | Just _ <- isSatTyFamApp mb_tc_app1 -- (C2) A (not-over-saturated) type-family application+ = maybeApart MARTypeFamily -- behaves like a type variable; might match - | isTyFamApp mb_tc_app2 -- A (not-over-saturated) type-family application- , um_unif env -- behaves like a type variable; might unify- = maybeApart MARTypeFamily+ | Just _ <- isSatTyFamApp mb_tc_app2 -- (C2) A (not-over-saturated) type-family application+ -- behaves like a type variable; might unify+ -- but doesn't match (as in the TyVarTy case)+ = if um_unif env then maybeApart MARTypeFamily else surelyApart + -- Handle oversaturated type families.+ --+ -- They can match an application (TyConApp/FunTy/AppTy), this is handled+ -- the same way as in the AppTy case below.+ --+ -- If there is no application, an oversaturated type family can only+ -- match a type variable or a saturated type family,+ -- both of which we handled earlier. So we can say surelyApart.+ | Just (tc1, _) <- mb_tc_app1+ , isTypeFamilyTyCon tc1+ = if | Just (ty1a, ty1b) <- tcSplitAppTyNoView_maybe ty1+ , Just (ty2a, ty2b) <- tcSplitAppTyNoView_maybe ty2+ -> unify_ty_app env ty1a [ty1b] ty2a [ty2b] -- (C3)+ | otherwise -> surelyApart -- (C4)++ | Just (tc2, _) <- mb_tc_app2+ , isTypeFamilyTyCon tc2+ = if | Just (ty1a, ty1b) <- tcSplitAppTyNoView_maybe ty1+ , Just (ty2a, ty2b) <- tcSplitAppTyNoView_maybe ty2+ -> unify_ty_app env ty1a [ty1b] ty2a [ty2b] -- (C3)+ | otherwise -> surelyApart -- (C4)++ -- At this point, neither tc1 nor tc2 can be a type family.+ | Just (tc1, tys1) <- mb_tc_app1+ , Just (tc2, tys2) <- mb_tc_app2+ , tc1 == tc2+ = do { massertPpr (isInjectiveTyCon tc1 Nominal) (ppr tc1)+ ; unify_tys env tys1 tys2+ }+ -- TYPE and CONSTRAINT are not Apart -- See Note [Type and Constraint are not apart] in GHC.Builtin.Types.Prim -- NB: at this point we know that the two TyCons do not match@@ -1160,16 +1246,16 @@ -- Possibly different saturations of a polykinded tycon -- See Note [Polykinded tycon applications] -isTyFamApp :: Maybe (TyCon, [Type]) -> Bool--- True if we have a saturated or under-saturated type family application+isSatTyFamApp :: Maybe (TyCon, [Type]) -> Maybe (TyCon, [Type])+-- Return the argument if we have a saturated type family application -- If it is /over/ saturated then we return False. E.g. -- unify_ty (F a b) (c d) where F has arity 1 -- we definitely want to decompose that type application! (#22647)-isTyFamApp (Just (tc, tys))- = not (isGenerativeTyCon tc Nominal) -- Type family-ish+isSatTyFamApp tapp@(Just (tc, tys))+ | isTypeFamilyTyCon tc && not (tys `lengthExceeds` tyConArity tc) -- Not over-saturated-isTyFamApp Nothing- = False+ = tapp+isSatTyFamApp _ = Nothing --------------------------------- uVar :: UMEnv
compiler/GHC/Core/Utils.hs view
@@ -515,8 +515,8 @@ -- | Tests whether we have to use a @case@ rather than @let@ binding for this -- expression as per the invariants of 'CoreExpr': see "GHC.Core#let_can_float_invariant" needsCaseBinding :: Type -> CoreExpr -> Bool-needsCaseBinding ty rhs =- mightBeUnliftedType ty && not (exprOkForSpeculation rhs)+needsCaseBinding ty rhs+ = mightBeUnliftedType ty && not (exprOkForSpeculation rhs) -- Make a case expression instead of a let -- These can arise either from the desugarer, -- or from beta reductions: (\x.e) (x +# y)
compiler/GHC/Platform.hs view
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ osElfTarget OSAIX = False osElfTarget OSHurd = True osElfTarget OSWasi = False+osElfTarget OSGhcjs = False osElfTarget OSUnknown = False -- Defaulting to False is safe; it means don't rely on any -- ELF-specific functionality. It is important to have a default for
compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/TcType.hs view
@@ -2387,22 +2387,32 @@ -} +-- | Why was the LHS 'PatersonSize' not strictly smaller than the RHS 'PatersonSize'?+--+-- See Note [Paterson conditions] in GHC.Tc.Validity. data PatersonSizeFailure- = PSF_TyFam TyCon -- Type family- | PSF_Size -- Too many type constructors/variables- | PSF_TyVar [TyVar] -- These type variables appear more often than in instance head;- -- no duplicates in this list+ -- | Either side contains a type family.+ = PSF_TyFam TyCon+ -- | The size of the LHS is not strictly less than the size of the RHS.+ | PSF_Size+ -- | These type variables appear more often in the LHS than in the RHS.+ | PSF_TyVar [TyVar] -- ^ no duplicates in this list -------------------------------------- -data PatersonSize -- See Note [Paterson conditions] in GHC.Tc.Validity- = PS_TyFam TyCon -- Mentions a type family; infinite size+-- | The Paterson size of a given type, in the sense of+-- Note [Paterson conditions] in GHC.Tc.Validity+--+-- - after expanding synonyms,+-- - ignoring coercions (as they are not user written).+data PatersonSize+ -- | The type mentions a type family, so the size could be anything.+ = PS_TyFam TyCon - | PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs :: [TyVar] -- Free tyvars, including repetitions;- , ps_size :: Int -- Number of type constructors and variables+ -- | The type does not mention a type family.+ | PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs :: [TyVar] -- ^ free tyvars, including repetitions;+ , ps_size :: Int -- ^ number of type constructors and variables }- -- Always after expanding synonyms- -- Always ignore coercions (not user written) -- ToDo: ignore invisible arguments? See Note [Invisible arguments and termination] instance Outputable PatersonSize where@@ -2415,21 +2425,26 @@ pSizeZero = PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs = [], ps_size = 0 } pSizeOne = PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs = [], ps_size = 1 } -ltPatersonSize :: PatersonSize -- Size of constraint- -> PatersonSize -- Size of instance head; never PS_TyFam+-- | @ltPatersonSize ps1 ps2@ returns:+--+-- - @Nothing@ iff @ps1@ is definitely strictly smaller than @ps2@,+-- - @Just ps_fail@ otherwise; @ps_fail@ says what went wrong.+ltPatersonSize :: PatersonSize+ -> PatersonSize -> Maybe PatersonSizeFailure--- (ps1 `ltPatersonSize` ps2) returns--- Nothing iff ps1 is strictly smaller than p2--- Just ps_fail says what went wrong-ltPatersonSize (PS_TyFam tc) _ = Just (PSF_TyFam tc) ltPatersonSize (PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs = tvs1, ps_size = s1 }) (PS_Vanilla { ps_tvs = tvs2, ps_size = s2 }) | s1 >= s2 = Just PSF_Size | bad_tvs@(_:_) <- noMoreTyVars tvs1 tvs2 = Just (PSF_TyVar bad_tvs) | otherwise = Nothing -- OK!-ltPatersonSize (PS_Vanilla {}) (PS_TyFam tc)- = pprPanic "ltPSize" (ppr tc)- -- Impossible because we never have a type family in an instance head+ltPatersonSize (PS_TyFam tc) _ = Just (PSF_TyFam tc)+ltPatersonSize _ (PS_TyFam tc) = Just (PSF_TyFam tc)+ -- NB: this last equation is never taken when checking instances, because+ -- type families are disallowed in instance heads.+ --+ -- However, this function is also used in the logic for solving superclass+ -- constraints (see Note [Solving superclass constraints] in GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance),+ -- in which case we might well hit this case (see e.g. T23171). noMoreTyVars :: [TyVar] -- Free vars (with repetitions) of the constraint C -> [TyVar] -- Free vars (with repetitions) of the head H
compiler/GHC/Types/Id.hs view
@@ -723,12 +723,14 @@ zapIdDmdSig :: Id -> Id zapIdDmdSig id = modifyIdInfo (`setDmdSigInfo` nopSig) id --- | This predicate says whether the 'Id' has a strict demand placed on it or--- has a type such that it can always be evaluated strictly (i.e an--- unlifted type, as of GHC 7.6). We need to--- check separately whether the 'Id' has a so-called \"strict type\" because if--- the demand for the given @id@ hasn't been computed yet but @id@ has a strict--- type, we still want @isStrictId id@ to be @True@.+-- | `isStrictId` says whether either+-- (a) the 'Id' has a strict demand placed on it or+-- (b) definitely has a \"strict type\", such that it can always be+-- evaluated strictly (i.e an unlifted type)+-- We need to check (b) as well as (a), because when the demand for the+-- given `id` hasn't been computed yet but `id` has a strict+-- type, we still want `isStrictId id` to be `True`.+-- Returns False if the type is levity polymorphic; False is always safe. isStrictId :: Id -> Bool isStrictId id | assertPpr (isId id) (text "isStrictId: not an id: " <+> ppr id) $
compiler/GHC/Types/Id/Make.hs view
@@ -1048,8 +1048,7 @@ arg_ty' = case mb_co of { Just redn -> scaledSet arg_ty (reductionReducedType redn) ; Nothing -> arg_ty }- , all (not . isNewTyCon . fst) (splitTyConApp_maybe $ scaledThing arg_ty')- , shouldUnpackTy bang_opts unpk_prag fam_envs arg_ty'+ , shouldUnpackArgTy bang_opts unpk_prag fam_envs arg_ty' = if bang_opt_unbox_disable bang_opts then HsStrict True -- Not unpacking because of -O0 -- See Note [Detecting useless UNPACK pragmas] in GHC.Core.DataCon@@ -1324,69 +1323,95 @@ mkUbxSumAltTy [ty] = ty mkUbxSumAltTy tys = mkTupleTy Unboxed tys -shouldUnpackTy :: BangOpts -> SrcUnpackedness -> FamInstEnvs -> Scaled Type -> Bool+shouldUnpackArgTy :: BangOpts -> SrcUnpackedness -> FamInstEnvs -> Scaled Type -> Bool -- True if we ought to unpack the UNPACK the argument type -- See Note [Recursive unboxing] -- We look "deeply" inside rather than relying on the DataCons -- we encounter on the way, because otherwise we might well -- end up relying on ourselves!-shouldUnpackTy bang_opts prag fam_envs ty- | Just data_cons <- unpackable_type_datacons (scaledThing ty)- = all (ok_con_args emptyNameSet) data_cons && should_unpack data_cons+shouldUnpackArgTy bang_opts prag fam_envs arg_ty+ | Just data_cons <- unpackable_type_datacons (scaledThing arg_ty)+ , all ok_con data_cons -- Returns True only if we can't get a+ -- loop involving these data cons+ , should_unpack prag arg_ty data_cons -- ...hence the call to dataConArgUnpack in+ -- should_unpack won't loop+ -- See Wrinkle (W1b) of Note [Recursive unboxing] for this loopy stuff+ = True+ | otherwise = False where- ok_con_args :: NameSet -> DataCon -> Bool- ok_con_args dcs con- | dc_name `elemNameSet` dcs- = False- | otherwise- = all (ok_arg dcs')- (dataConOrigArgTys con `zip` dataConSrcBangs con)- -- NB: dataConSrcBangs gives the *user* request;- -- We'd get a black hole if we used dataConImplBangs+ ok_con :: DataCon -> Bool -- True <=> OK to unpack+ ok_con top_con -- False <=> not safe+ = ok_args emptyNameSet top_con where- dc_name = getName con- dcs' = dcs `extendNameSet` dc_name+ top_con_name = getName top_con - ok_arg :: NameSet -> (Scaled Type, HsSrcBang) -> Bool- ok_arg dcs (Scaled _ ty, bang)- = not (attempt_unpack bang) || ok_ty dcs norm_ty- where- norm_ty = topNormaliseType fam_envs ty+ ok_args dcs con+ = all (ok_arg dcs) $+ (dataConOrigArgTys con `zip` dataConSrcBangs con)+ -- NB: dataConSrcBangs gives the *user* request;+ -- We'd get a black hole if we used dataConImplBangs - ok_ty :: NameSet -> Type -> Bool- ok_ty dcs ty- | Just data_cons <- unpackable_type_datacons ty- = all (ok_con_args dcs) data_cons- | otherwise- = True -- NB True here, in contrast to False at top level+ ok_arg :: NameSet -> (Scaled Type, HsSrcBang) -> Bool+ ok_arg dcs (Scaled _ ty, HsSrcBang _ unpack_prag str_prag)+ | strict_field str_prag+ , Just data_cons <- unpackable_type_datacons (topNormaliseType fam_envs ty)+ , should_unpack_conservative unpack_prag data_cons -- Wrinkle (W3)+ = all (ok_rec_con dcs) data_cons -- of Note [Recursive unboxing]+ | otherwise+ = True -- NB True here, in contrast to False at top level - attempt_unpack :: HsSrcBang -> Bool- attempt_unpack (HsSrcBang _ SrcUnpack NoSrcStrict)- = bang_opt_strict_data bang_opts- attempt_unpack (HsSrcBang _ SrcUnpack SrcStrict)- = True- attempt_unpack (HsSrcBang _ NoSrcUnpack SrcStrict)- = True -- Be conservative- attempt_unpack (HsSrcBang _ NoSrcUnpack NoSrcStrict)- = bang_opt_strict_data bang_opts -- Be conservative- attempt_unpack _ = False+ -- See Note [Recursive unboxing]+ -- * Do not look at the HsImplBangs to `con`; see Wrinkle (W1a)+ -- * For the "at the root" comments see Wrinkle (W2)+ ok_rec_con dcs con+ | dc_name == top_con_name = False -- Recursion at the root+ | dc_name `elemNameSet` dcs = True -- Not at the root+ | otherwise = ok_args (dcs `extendNameSet` dc_name) con+ where+ dc_name = getName con - -- Determine whether we ought to unpack a field based on user annotations if present and heuristics if not.- should_unpack data_cons =+ strict_field :: SrcStrictness -> Bool+ -- True <=> strict field+ strict_field NoSrcStrict = bang_opt_strict_data bang_opts+ strict_field SrcStrict = True+ strict_field SrcLazy = False++ -- Determine whether we ought to unpack a field,+ -- based on user annotations if present.+ -- A conservative version of should_unpack that doesn't look at how+ -- many fields the field would unpack to... because that leads to a loop.+ -- "Conservative" = err on the side of saying "yes".+ should_unpack_conservative :: SrcUnpackedness -> [DataCon] -> Bool+ should_unpack_conservative SrcNoUnpack _ = False -- {-# NOUNPACK #-}+ should_unpack_conservative SrcUnpack _ = True -- {-# NOUNPACK #-}+ should_unpack_conservative NoSrcUnpack dcs = not (is_sum dcs)+ -- is_sum: we never unpack sums without a pragma; otherwise be conservative++ -- Determine whether we ought to unpack a field,+ -- based on user annotations if present, and heuristics if not.+ should_unpack :: SrcUnpackedness -> Scaled Type -> [DataCon] -> Bool+ should_unpack prag arg_ty data_cons = case prag of SrcNoUnpack -> False -- {-# NOUNPACK #-} SrcUnpack -> True -- {-# UNPACK #-} NoSrcUnpack -- No explicit unpack pragma, so use heuristics- | (_:_:_) <- data_cons- -> False -- don't unpack sum types automatically, but they can be unpacked with an explicit source UNPACK.- | otherwise+ | is_sum data_cons+ -> False -- Don't unpack sum types automatically, but they can+ -- be unpacked with an explicit source UNPACK.+ | otherwise -- Wrinkle (W4) of Note [Recursive unboxing] -> bang_opt_unbox_strict bang_opts || (bang_opt_unbox_small bang_opts && rep_tys `lengthAtMost` 1) -- See Note [Unpack one-wide fields]- where (rep_tys, _) = dataConArgUnpack ty+ where+ (rep_tys, _) = dataConArgUnpack arg_ty + is_sum :: [DataCon] -> Bool+ -- We never unpack sum types automatically+ -- (Product types, we do. Empty types are weeded out by unpackable_type_datacons.)+ is_sum (_:_:_) = True+ is_sum _ = False -- Given a type already assumed to have been normalized by topNormaliseType, -- unpackable_type_datacons ty = Just datacons@@ -1398,11 +1423,11 @@ unpackable_type_datacons :: Type -> Maybe [DataCon] unpackable_type_datacons ty | Just (tc, _) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty- , not (isNewTyCon tc)- -- Even though `ty` has been normalised, it could still- -- be a /recursive/ newtype, so we must check for that+ , not (isNewTyCon tc) -- Even though `ty` has been normalised, it could still+ -- be a /recursive/ newtype, so we must check for that , Just cons <- tyConDataCons_maybe tc- , not (null cons)+ , not (null cons) -- Don't upack nullary sums; no need.+ -- They already take zero bits , all (null . dataConExTyCoVars) cons = Just cons -- See Note [Unpacking GADTs and existentials] | otherwise@@ -1458,20 +1483,74 @@ data T = MkT {-# UNPACK #-} !T Int Because then we'd get an infinite number of arguments. -Here is a more complicated case:- data S = MkS {-# UNPACK #-} !T Int- data T = MkT {-# UNPACK #-} !S Int-Each of S and T must decide independently whether to unpack-and they had better not both say yes. So they must both say no.--Also behave conservatively when there is no UNPACK pragma- data T = MkS !T Int-with -funbox-strict-fields or -funbox-small-strict-fields-we need to behave as if there was an UNPACK pragma there.--But it's the *argument* type that matters. This is fine:+Note that it's the *argument* type that matters. This is fine: data S = MkS S !Int because Int is non-recursive.++Wrinkles:++(W1a) We have to be careful that the compiler doesn't go into a loop!+ First, we must not look at the HsImplBang decisions of data constructors+ in the same mutually recursive group. E.g.+ data S = MkS {-# UNPACK #-} !T Int+ data T = MkT {-# UNPACK #-} !S Int+ Each of S and T must decide /independently/ whether to unpack+ and they had better not both say yes. So they must both say no.+ (We could detect when we leave the group, and /then/ we can rely on+ HsImplBangs; but that requires more plumbing.)++(W1b) Here is another way the compiler might go into a loop (test T23307b):+ data data T = MkT !S Int+ data S = MkS !T+ Suppose we call `shouldUnpackArgTy` on the !S arg of `T`. In `should_unpack`+ we ask if the number of fields that `MkS` unpacks to is small enough+ (via rep_tys `lengthAtMost` 1). But how many field /does/ `MkS` unpack+ to? Well it depends on the unpacking decision we make for `MkS`, which+ in turn depends on `MkT`, which we are busy deciding. Black holes beckon.++ So we /first/ call `ok_con` on `MkS` (and `ok_con` is conservative;+ see `should_unpack_conservative`), and only /then/ call `should_unpack`.+ Tricky!++(W2) As #23307 shows, we /do/ want to unpack the second arg of the Yes+ data constructor in this example, despite the recursion in List:+ data Stream a = Cons a !(Stream a)+ data Unconsed a = Unconsed a !(Stream a)+ data MUnconsed a = No | Yes {-# UNPACK #-} !(Unconsed a)+ When looking at+ {-# UNPACK #-} (Unconsed a)+ we can take Unconsed apart, but then get into a loop with Stream.+ That's fine: we can still take Unconsed apart. It's only if we+ have a loop /at the root/ that we must not unpack.++(W3) Moreover (W2) can apply even if there is a recursive loop:+ data List a = Nil | Cons {-# UNPACK #-} !(Unconsed a)+ data Unconsed a = Unconsed a !(List a)+ Here there is mutual recursion between `Unconsed` and `List`; and yet+ we can unpack the field of `Cons` because we will not unpack the second+ field of `Unconsed`: we never unpack a sum type without an explicit+ pragma (see should_unpack).++(W4) Consider+ data T = MkT !Wombat+ data Wombat = MkW {-# UNPACK #-} !S Int+ data S = MkS {-# NOUNPACK #-} !Wombat Int+ Suppose we are deciding whether to unpack the first field of MkT, by+ calling (shouldUnpackArgTy Wombat). Then we'll try to unpack the !S field+ of MkW, and be stopped by the {-# NOUNPACK #-}, and all is fine; we can+ unpack MkT.++ If that NOUNPACK had been a UNPACK, though, we'd get a loop, and would+ decide not to unpack the Wombat field of MkT.++ But what if there was no pragma in `data S`? Then we /still/ decide not+ to unpack the Wombat field of MkT (at least when auto-unpacking is on),+ because we don't know for sure which decision will be taken for the+ Wombat field of MkS.++ TL;DR when there is no pragma, behave as if there was a UNPACK, at least+ when auto-unpacking is on. See `should_unpack` in `shouldUnpackArgTy`.+ ************************************************************************ * *
compiler/ghc.cabal view
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ -- ./configure. Make sure you are editing ghc.cabal.in, not ghc.cabal. Name: ghc-Version: 9.6.1+Version: 9.6.2 License: BSD-3-Clause License-File: LICENSE Author: The GHC Team@@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ transformers >= 0.5 && < 0.7, exceptions == 0.10.*, stm,- ghc-boot == 9.6.1,- ghc-heap == 9.6.1,- ghci == 9.6.1+ ghc-boot == 9.6.2,+ ghc-heap == 9.6.2,+ ghci == 9.6.2 if os(windows) Build-Depends: Win32 >= 2.3 && < 2.14
ghc-lib-parser.cabal view
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ cabal-version: 2.0 build-type: Simple name: ghc-lib-parser-version: 9.6.1.20230312+version: 9.6.2.20230523 license: BSD3 license-file: LICENSE category: Development
ghc-lib/stage0/libraries/ghc-boot/build/GHC/Version.hs view
@@ -3,19 +3,19 @@ import Prelude -- See Note [Why do we import Prelude here?] cProjectGitCommitId :: String-cProjectGitCommitId = "a58c028a181106312e1a783e82a37fc657ce9cfe"+cProjectGitCommitId = "7e70df17aee2e39bc599b43e59a52bb30064df4d" cProjectVersion :: String-cProjectVersion = "9.6.1"+cProjectVersion = "9.6.2" cProjectVersionInt :: String cProjectVersionInt = "906" cProjectPatchLevel :: String-cProjectPatchLevel = "1"+cProjectPatchLevel = "2" cProjectPatchLevel1 :: String-cProjectPatchLevel1 = "1"+cProjectPatchLevel1 = "2" cProjectPatchLevel2 :: String cProjectPatchLevel2 = "0"
ghc-lib/stage0/rts/build/include/GhclibDerivedConstants.h view
@@ -68,29 +68,29 @@ #define OFFSET_stgGCEnter1 -16 #define OFFSET_stgGCFun -8 #define OFFSET_Capability_r 24-#define OFFSET_Capability_lock 1216+#define OFFSET_Capability_lock 1224 #define OFFSET_Capability_no 944 #define REP_Capability_no b32 #define Capability_no(__ptr__) REP_Capability_no[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_no] #define OFFSET_Capability_mut_lists 1016 #define REP_Capability_mut_lists b64 #define Capability_mut_lists(__ptr__) REP_Capability_mut_lists[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_mut_lists]-#define OFFSET_Capability_context_switch 1184+#define OFFSET_Capability_context_switch 1192 #define REP_Capability_context_switch b32 #define Capability_context_switch(__ptr__) REP_Capability_context_switch[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_context_switch]-#define OFFSET_Capability_interrupt 1188+#define OFFSET_Capability_interrupt 1196 #define REP_Capability_interrupt b32 #define Capability_interrupt(__ptr__) REP_Capability_interrupt[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_interrupt]-#define OFFSET_Capability_sparks 1320+#define OFFSET_Capability_sparks 1328 #define REP_Capability_sparks b64 #define Capability_sparks(__ptr__) REP_Capability_sparks[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_sparks]-#define OFFSET_Capability_total_allocated 1192+#define OFFSET_Capability_total_allocated 1200 #define REP_Capability_total_allocated b64 #define Capability_total_allocated(__ptr__) REP_Capability_total_allocated[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_total_allocated]-#define OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd 1168+#define OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd 1176 #define REP_Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd b64 #define Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd(__ptr__) REP_Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_hd]-#define OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl 1176+#define OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl 1184 #define REP_Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl b64 #define Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl(__ptr__) REP_Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl[__ptr__+OFFSET_Capability_weak_ptr_list_tl] #define OFFSET_bdescr_start 0
ghc/ghc-bin.cabal view
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ -- ./configure. Make sure you are editing ghc-bin.cabal.in, not ghc-bin.cabal. Name: ghc-bin-Version: 9.6.1+Version: 9.6.2 Copyright: XXX -- License: XXX -- License-File: XXX@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ filepath >= 1 && < 1.5, containers >= 0.5 && < 0.7, transformers >= 0.5 && < 0.7,- ghc-boot == 9.6.1,- ghc == 9.6.1+ ghc-boot == 9.6.2,+ ghc == 9.6.2 if os(windows) Build-Depends: Win32 >= 2.3 && < 2.14@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Build-depends: deepseq == 1.4.*, ghc-prim >= 0.5.0 && < 0.11,- ghci == 9.6.1,+ ghci == 9.6.2, haskeline == 0.8.*, exceptions == 0.10.*, time >= 1.8 && < 1.13
libraries/ghc-boot-th/ghc-boot-th.cabal view
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ -- ghc-boot-th.cabal.in, not ghc-boot-th.cabal. name: ghc-boot-th-version: 9.6.1+version: 9.6.2 license: BSD3 license-file: LICENSE category: GHC
libraries/ghc-boot/GHC/Platform/ArchOS.hs view
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ | OSAIX | OSHurd | OSWasi+ | OSGhcjs deriving (Read, Show, Eq, Ord) @@ -157,3 +158,4 @@ OSAIX -> "aix" OSHurd -> "hurd" OSWasi -> "wasi"+ OSGhcjs -> "ghcjs"
libraries/ghc-boot/ghc-boot.cabal view
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ -- ghc-boot.cabal. name: ghc-boot-version: 9.6.1+version: 9.6.2 license: BSD-3-Clause license-file: LICENSE category: GHC@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ directory >= 1.2 && < 1.4, filepath >= 1.3 && < 1.5, deepseq >= 1.4 && < 1.5,- ghc-boot-th == 9.6.1+ ghc-boot-th == 9.6.2 if !os(windows) build-depends: unix >= 2.7 && < 2.9
libraries/ghc-heap/ghc-heap.cabal view
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ cabal-version: 3.0 name: ghc-heap-version: 9.6.1+version: 9.6.2 license: BSD-3-Clause license-file: LICENSE maintainer: libraries@haskell.org
libraries/ghci/GHCi/Message.hs view
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ #define MIN_VERSION_ghc_heap(major1,major2,minor) (\ (major1) < 9 || \ (major1) == 9 && (major2) < 6 || \- (major1) == 9 && (major2) == 6 && (minor) <= 1)+ (major1) == 9 && (major2) == 6 && (minor) <= 2) #endif /* MIN_VERSION_ghc_heap */ #if MIN_VERSION_ghc_heap(8,11,0) instance Binary Heap.StgTSOProfInfo
libraries/ghci/ghci.cabal view
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ -- ../../configure. Make sure you are editing ghci.cabal.in, not ghci.cabal. name: ghci-version: 9.6.1+version: 9.6.2 license: BSD3 license-file: LICENSE category: GHC@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ containers >= 0.5 && < 0.7, deepseq == 1.4.*, filepath == 1.4.*,- ghc-boot == 9.6.1,- ghc-heap == 9.6.1,+ ghc-boot == 9.6.2,+ ghc-heap == 9.6.2, template-haskell == 2.20.*, transformers >= 0.5 && < 0.7
libraries/template-haskell/template-haskell.cabal view
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ build-depends: base >= 4.11 && < 4.19,- ghc-boot-th == 9.6.1,+ ghc-boot-th == 9.6.2, ghc-prim, pretty == 1.1.*