packages feed

aeson 0.3.2.6 → 0.3.2.7

raw patch · 2 files changed

+23/−23 lines, 2 filesPVP ok

version bump matches the API change (PVP)

API changes (from Hackage documentation)

Files

Data/Aeson/Parser.hs view
@@ -33,17 +33,17 @@ import Data.Word (Word8) import qualified Data.Attoparsec as A import qualified Data.Attoparsec.Zepto as Z+import qualified Data.ByteString.Char8 as B8 import qualified Data.ByteString.Unsafe as B  -- | Parse a top-level JSON value.  This must be either an object or -- an array. json :: Parser Value json = do-  c <- skipSpace *> anyChar-  case c of-    '{' -> object_-    '[' -> array_-    _   -> fail "root value is not an object or array"+  c <- skipSpace *> satisfy (`B8.elem` "{[")+  if c == '{'+    then object_+    else array_  object_ :: Parser Value object_ = {-# SCC "object_" #-} do@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ value = most <|> (Number <$> number)  where   most = do-    c <- anyChar+    c <- satisfy (`B8.elem` "{[\"ftn")     case c of       '{' -> object_       '[' -> array_@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@       'f' -> string "alse" *> pure (Bool False)       't' -> string "rue" *> pure (Bool True)       'n' -> string "ull" *> pure Null-      _   -> fail "not a valid JSON value"+      _   -> error "attoparsec panic! the impossible happened!"  doubleQuote, backslash :: Word8 doubleQuote = 34
aeson.cabal view
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ name:            aeson-version:         0.3.2.6+version:         0.3.2.7 license:         BSD3 license-file:    LICENSE category:        Text, Web, JSON@@ -20,41 +20,41 @@     Parsing performance on a late 2010 MacBook Pro (2.66GHz Core i7),     for mostly-English tweets from Twitter's JSON search API:     .-    * 0.8 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 29945 msg\/sec (24.4 MB\/sec)+    * 0.8 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 30538 msg\/sec (24.9 MB\/sec)     .-    * 0.8 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 29280 msg\/sec (23.8 MB\/sec)+    * 0.8 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 31204 msg\/sec (25.4 MB\/sec)     .-    * 6.4 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 6684 msg\/sec (42.0 MB\/sec)+    * 6.4 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 6731 msg\/sec (42.3 MB\/sec)     .-    * 6.4 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 5893 msg\/sec (37.1 MB\/sec)+    * 6.4 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 6627 msg\/sec (41.7 MB\/sec)     .-    * 11.8 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 3610 msg\/sec (41.5 MB\/sec)+    * 11.8 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 3751 msg\/sec (43.2 MB\/sec)     .-    * 11.8 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 3059 msg\/sec (35.2 MB\/sec)+    * 11.8 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 3381 msg\/sec (38.9 MB\/sec)     .     * 31.2 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 1306 msg\/sec (39.8 MB\/sec)     .-    * 31.2 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 1050 msg\/sec (32.0 MB\/sec)+    * 31.2 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 1132 msg\/sec (34.5 MB\/sec)     .-    * 61.5 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 594 msg\/sec (35.7 MB\/sec)+    * 61.5 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 616 msg\/sec (37.0 MB\/sec)     .-    * 61.5 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 505 msg\/sec (30.3 MB\/sec)+    * 61.5 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 534 msg\/sec (32.1 MB\/sec)     .     Handling heavily-escaped text is a little more work.  Here is     parsing performance with Japanese tweets, where much of the text     is entirely Unicode-escaped.     .-    * 14.6 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 2257 msg\/sec (32.2 MB\/sec)+    * 14.6 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 2315 msg\/sec (33.1 MB\/sec)     .-    * 14.6 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 1931 msg\/sec (27.6 MB\/sec)+    * 14.6 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 1986 msg\/sec (28.4 MB\/sec)     .-    * 44.1 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 697 msg\/sec (30.0 MB\/sec)+    * 44.1 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 712 msg\/sec (30.7 MB\/sec)     .-    * 44.1 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 611 msg\/sec (26.3 MB\/sec)+    * 44.1 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 634 msg\/sec (27.3 MB\/sec)     .-    * 82.9 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 368 msg\/sec (29.8 MB\/sec)+    * 82.9 KB, 32-bit GHC 6.12.3: 377 msg\/sec (30.5 MB\/sec)     .-    * 82.9 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 322 msg\/sec (26.0 MB\/sec)+    * 82.9 KB, 64-bit GHC 7.0.3: 332 msg\/sec (26.9 MB\/sec)     .     Encoding performance on the same machine and data:     .